/
Article

Physics in combustion research

DEC 01, 1975
Modelling and diagnostics are two areas in which physics can contribute to reduced pollutant emissions and improved engine efficiency—a 1% increase would save the US 14.5 million barrels of oil a year.
Danny Hartley
Donald Hardesty
Marshall Lapp

Virtually all the energy we derive from fossil fuels is obtained through some form of combustion. Any technical advance that can result in more efficient combustion systems without sacrificing environmental quality would therefore be a major contribution to energy conservation. For example, every one‐percent increase in auto engine combustion efficiency saves about 14.5 million barrels of oil per year, gaining the US over 150 million dollars per year in balance of payments. Although research in specific technological areas is usually difficult to justify from economic arguments, this is not the case for combustion research, as these figures show. The return on the investment pays for combustion research many times over. In addition, improved control of combustion processes should result in lower pollutant emissions and thereby reduce such hidden costs of burning fossil fuels as exhaust‐gas cleanup and damages to health and environment. However, combustion devices, like most other engineering systems, face performance limitations of an inherently scientific nature.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. J. B. Heywood, AIP Conference Proceedings No. 19, Physics and the Energy Problem—1974 (M. D. Fiske, W. W. Havens, Jr, eds.) American Institute of Physics, New York (1974);
    I. Glassman, W. A. Sirignano, Summary Report of the Workshop on Energy‐Related Basic Combustion Research, Princeton University Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences Report No. 1177 (1974).

  2. 2. The Role of Physics in Combustion, (D. L. Hartley, D. R. Hardesty, M. Lapp, J. Dooher, F. Dryer, eds.) in AIP Conference Proceedings No. 25, Efficient Use of Energy, American Institute of Physics, New York (1975).

  3. 3. “Power Plants and Clean Air: The State of the Art,” Special Publication No. 6, Power Engineering Society, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, New York (1973).

  4. 4. F. A. Williams, Combustion Theory, Addison‐Wesley Publishing Co, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts (1965);
    R. F. Fristrom, A. A. Westenberg, Flame Structure, McGraw‐Hill, New York (1965);
    B. Lewis, G. von Elbe, Combustion, Flames and Explosions of Gases, Academic Press, New York (1961);
    D. B. Spalding, Some Fundamentals of Combustion, Academic Press, London (1955).

  5. 5. S. S. Penner, Quantitative Molecular Spectroscopy and Gas Emissivities, Addison‐Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Reading Massachusetts (1959);
    K. G. P. Sulzmann, J. E. L. Lowder, S. S. Penner, Combustion and Flame 20, 177 (1973).https://doi.org/CBFMAO

  6. 6. J. D. Trolinger, Laser Applications in Flow Diagnostics, AGARDograph No. 186, NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (1974).

  7. 7. Laser Raman Gas Diagnostics, (M. Lapp, C. M. Penney, eds.), Plenum Press, New York (1974).

  8. 8. M. Lapp, D. L. Hartley, Combustion Science and Technology (to be published).

  9. 9. C. J. Vear, P. J. Hendra, J. J. Macfarlane, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 7, 381 (1972); https://doi.org/JCCCAT
    R. H. Barnes, C. E. Moeller, J. F. Kircher, C. M. Verber, Appl. Opt. 12, 2531 (1973).https://doi.org/APOPAI

More about the authors

Danny Hartley, Combustion Research Division of Sandia Laboratories, Livermore, California.

Donald Hardesty, Combustion Research Division of Sandia Laboratories, Livermore, California.

Marshall Lapp, Physicist, General Electric Research and Development Center, Schenectady, New York.

Related content
/
Article
Myriad solutions emerge in the stressful process of balancing professional ambition and personal happiness.
/
Article
An interview with a prominent member of the Marshallese diaspora delves into the ongoing impact of aboveground US nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific archipelago.
/
Article
Detecting quantum particles of gravity was long considered hopeless. A new perspective, which takes advantage of quantum technologies, suggests that an experimental realization may be closer than previously thought.
/
Article
As higher-education programs compete for a shrinking pool of students, departments must better communicate the value that a physics major brings.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1975_12.jpeg

Volume 28, Number 12

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.