Physics and physicists of the past fifty years
DOI: 10.1063/1.3059962
Dr. Wigner, Members of the American Physical Society and of other Societies associated with the American Institute of Physics, and Guests: In the case of British organizations such as the Royal Society and the British Association, it is quite customary for the president to deliver an address of a general, nontechnical character. On the other hand, in the case at least of the American Physical Society, a purely technical paper is much more common. It seems to me, however, that at a meeting where several hundred technical papers appear on the program, at least one nontechnical paper may appropriately find a place.
This article is only available in PDF format
References
1. J. C. Blankenagel, Am. J. Phys., 19, 60, Jan. (1951).https://doi.org/AJPIAS
2. W. L. Bragg, Phil. Mag., 20, 385, Sept. (1910).https://doi.org/PHMAA4
3. Henry Crew, The Rise of Modern Physics, pp. 366–368
4. E. Rutherford, Phil. Mag., 21, 669 (1911).https://doi.org/PHMAA4
5. R. A. Millikan, Phil. Mag., 19, 209, Feb. (1910).https://doi.org/PHMAA4
6. R. A. Millikan, Science, 32, 436, Sept. 30 (1910).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
7. J. H. Hildebrand, Chem. Eng. News, p. 4164, Oct. 3 (1955).
8. C. T. R. Wilson, Proc. Roy. Soc., A85, 285, June (1911).
9. R. T. Birge, Astrophys. J., 32, 112 (1910).https://doi.org/ASJOAB
10. N. Bohr, Phil. Mag., 26, 1 (1913).https://doi.org/PHMAA4
11. E. C. Kemble, Bull. Nat. Res. Council No. 57, pp. 17–18.
12. R. T. Birge, Nature, 116, 783 (1925).https://doi.org/NATUAS
13. A. S. Eddington, Proc. Roy. Soc., A122, 358 (1929).
14. R. T. Birge, Revs. Mod. Phys., 1, 1 (1929).https://doi.org/RMPHAT
15. R. T. Birge, Nature, 123, 318 (1929).https://doi.org/NATUAS
16. A. S. Eddington, Proc. Roy. Soc., A126, 696 (1930).
17. Nat. Res. Council, Reprint and Circular Series No. 42 (1923).
18. Doctoral Dissertations, No. 21, 1953–54, H. W. Wilson Co.
19. J. T. Rettaliata, School Soc., 80, 134, Oct. 30 (1954).
20. A Policy for Scientific and Professional Manpower, National Manpower Council, Columbia U. Press (1953).
21. P. F. Brandwein, Am. J. Phys., 23, 537, Nov. (1955).https://doi.org/AJPIAS
22. W. C. Kelly, p. 12, Physics Today, March (1955).
23. Chem. Eng. News, p. 4324, Oct. 10 (1955), (“Secretary’s Office”).
24. Ibid, p. 5585, Dec. 26 (1955).
25. Science, 122, 1261, Dec. 30 (1955); https://doi.org/SCIEAS
also Chem. Eng. News, p. 139, Jan. 9 (1956).26. N. Y. Times, Sept. 8 (1955),
quoted in “What the Colleges are Doing”, Jan. (1956).27. AP Dispatch, Chicago, Jan. 13 (1956).
28. Physics Today, p. 20, Sept. (1955).
29. Chem. Eng. News, p. 5584, Dec. 26 (1955).
30. Shell News, Dec. (1955).
31. Readers Digest, p. 98, Jan. (1956).
32. R. T. Birge, Am. J. Phys., 9, 24 (1941).https://doi.org/AJPIAS
33. Dael Wolfle, Nat. Acad. Sci. News Rep., 5, 1, Jan.–Feb. (1955).
34. Marsh White, Am. J. Phys., 22, 421 (1954).https://doi.org/AJPIAS
35. P. W. Bridgman, Reflections of a Physicist, Philosophical Library (1950).
36. Quoted by R. D. Reid, Am. Scientist, 41, 286 (1953).https://doi.org/AMSCAC
37. Jan Dembowski, Science in New Poland, Lawrence and Wishart, London (1952).
38. Editorial, Los Angeles Times, Nov. 9 (1955).
39. Sci. News Let., p. 342, Nov. 26 (1955).
40. Editorial, Science, 122, 581, Sept. 30 (1955).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
41. Federal Funds for Science, Nat. Sci. Found. (1955).
42. Chem. Eng. News (NSF report), p. 24, Jan. 2 (1956).
43. Bull. Atomic Sci., “Secrecy, Security and Loyalty”, April (1955).
44. Editorial, Science, 122, 1059, Dec. 2 (1955).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
45. Bull. Atomic Sci., “American Visa Policy: A Report”, pp. 367–371, Dec. (1955).
46. George R. Stewart, The Year of the Oath, 156 pp., Doubleday (1950).
More about the authors
Raymond T. Birge, University of California at Berkeley.
