Discover
/
Article

Pauli and nuclear spin

JUN 01, 1961
S. A. Goudsmit

There seems to be an increasing interest in the history of physics, especially of the physics of the roaring twenties when modern atomic structure and quantum mechanics were born. Writing about so recent a period, with most of the participants still alive, can lead to numerous unpleasant disagreements. It would be most valuable if the principal actors would each tell their own story, just as generals are now writing about their own world war. It must be understood that such stories relate only subjective experiences mixed with uncertain inferences. These accounts can be extremely interesting, but they should not be considered as an objective history of the new physics and should be written in the first person singular. An objective history of science is perhaps only possible in very broad outlines and in its relation to the rest of history. When we try to look at a recent event with a microscope, the resolving power may often be insufficient. We would like to see clearly the lines of thought followed by the participants, but even they themselves may not be aware of why and how they arrived at their important results, and they may tell us instead what are merely rationalizations after the fact. It is rather easy to construct a history which gives a very plausible account of how new ideas and experiments could or should have developed, but it seems impossible to know how they actually arose, particularly when we ask about details.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. Sir Edmund Whittaker, History of the Theories of Æther and Electricity (Philosophical Library, New York, 1951).

  2. 2. Theoretical Physics in the Twentieth Century, edited by M. Fierz and V. F. Weisskopf (Interscience Publishers Inc., New York, 1960).

  3. 3. G. Joos, Z. Physik 26, 357 (1925).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  4. 4. A. E. Ruark and R. L. Chenault, Phil. Mag. 50, 937 (1925).https://doi.org/PHMAA4

  5. 5. H. Nagoaka and T. Mishima, Proc. Imp. Acad. (Tokyo) 2, 249 (1926).https://doi.org/PIATA8

  6. 6. S. Goudsmit and E. Back, Z. Physik 43, 321 (1927).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  7. 7. V. Thorsen, Z. Physik 40, 642 (1926).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  8. 8. E. Back and S. Goudsmit, Z. Physik 47, 174 (1928).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  9. 9. W. Pauli, Naturwissenschaften 12, 741 (1924).https://doi.org/NATWAY

  10. 10. W. Pauli, “Quantentheorie”, Handbuch der Physik (Verlag Julius Springer, Berlin, 1925), Vol. 33, Part 1, p. 277.

  11. 11. S. Goudsmit and R. F. Bacher, Phys. Rev. 34, 1499 (1929).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  12. 12. L. Pauling and S. Goudsmit, The Structure of Line Spectra (McGraw‐Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1930), p. 203.

  13. 13. P. Zeeman, E. Back, and S. Goudsmit, Z. Physik 66, 1 (1930); https://doi.org/ZEPYAA
    E. Back and J. Wulff, ibid., p. 10.

  14. 14. S. Goudsmit and R. F. Bacher, Z. Physik 66, 13 (1930).https://doi.org/ZEPYAA

  15. 15. W. Pauli, Exclusion Principle and Quantum Mechanics (Editions du Griffon, Neuchatel, Switzerland, 1947).

  16. 16. P. Ehrenfest, “Address on Award of Lorentz Medal to Professor W. Pauli”, Versl. Akad. Amsterdam 40, 121 (1931)
    and P. Ehrenfest, Collected Scientific Papers, edited by M. J. Klein (North‐Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1959).

  17. 17. D. M. Dennison, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A115, 483 (1927).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  18. 18. Note for historians: the author’s middle initial was rediscovered in 1944.

More about the Authors

S. A. Goudsmit. Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1961_06.jpeg

Volume 14, Number 6

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.