Discover
/
Article

Nuclear Mean‐Field Theory

APR 01, 1985
This theory provides insight into diverse nuclear phenomena ranging from ground‐state properties of nuclei and the matter in neutron stars to the dynamics of heavy‐ion collisions and spontaneous fission.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881019

John W. Negele

One of the fundamental challenges common to all areas of physics is to understand the properties of systems having large or infinite numbers of degrees of freedom in terms of known underlying interactions. Simply knowing the Schrödinger equation and Coulomb’s law, for example, is not sufficient to let us understand the chain through which atoms form molecules, which, in turn, beget macromolcules, which eventually aggregate into a biological object with a life of its own. Nor has knowledge of the Lagrangian for quantum chromodynamics yet yielded an understanding of hadrons. The physics of systems with many degrees of freedom often differs in crucial ways from what we understand for simple systems.

References

  1. 1. Extensive references to the work surveyed in this article are given in J. W. Negele, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 913 (1982).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  2. 2. K. A. Brueckner, C. A. Levinson, Pys. Rev. 97, 1344 (1955). https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    K. A. Brueckner, Phys. Rev. 97, 1353 (1955); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    K. A. Brueckner, 100, 36 (1955).
    H. A. Bethe, J. Goldstone, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A238, 551 (1957).
    L. C. Gomes, J. D. Walecka, V. F. Weisskopf, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 241 (1958); https://doi.org/APNYA6
    H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. B138, 804 (1965).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  3. 3. B. D. Day, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 495 (1978); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    H. K. Kümmel, K. Lührmann, J. Zabolitsky, Phys. Rep. C36, 1 (1978).

  4. 4. J. W. Negele, D. Vautherin, Phys. Rev. C 5, 1472 (1972); https://doi.org/PRVCAN
    J. W. Negele, Phys. Rev. C 1, 1260 (1970); https://doi.org/PRVCAN
    D. Gogny in, Nuclear Self‐Consistent Fields, G. Ripka, M. Porneuf, eds., North‐Holland, Amsterdam (1975) p. 33.

  5. 5. J. L. Friar, J. W. Negele, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 8, 219 (1975).https://doi.org/ANUPBZ

  6. 6. A. K. Kerman, S. E. Koonin, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 100, 322 (1976).https://doi.org/APNYA6

  7. 7. B. Frois, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 152 (1977).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  8. 8. J. W. Negele, G. Rinker, Phys. Rev. C 15, 1499 (1977).https://doi.org/PRVCAN

  9. 9. C. Creswell, PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1977).

  10. 10. J. W. Negele, D. Vautherin, Nucl. Phys. A207, 298 (1973).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  11. 11. M. S. Weiss, Fizika 9, Suppl. 3, 315 (1977).https://doi.org/FZKAAA

  12. 12. P. Bonche, S. E. Koonin, J. W. Negele, Phys. Rev. C 13, 1226 (1976); https://doi.org/PRVCAN
    G. F. Bertsch, in Nuclear Physics with Heavy Ions and Mesons, Les Houches Summer School XXX, R. Balian, M. Rho, G. Ripka, eds., North‐Holland, Amsterdam (1978).

  13. 13. P. Bonche, B. Grammaticos, S. E. Koonin, Phys. Rev. C 17, 1700 (1978).https://doi.org/PRVCAN

  14. 14. M. Conjeaud, et al., in Proc. Int. Conf. on Nuclear Structure, Tokyo, September 1977, International Academic Printing Co., Japan (1977) p. 663

  15. 15. R. P. Feynman, A. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals, McGraw‐Hill, New York (1965).

  16. 16. H. Kuratsuji, T. Suzuki, Phys. Lett. B92, 19 (1980); https://doi.org/PYLBAJ
    J. P. Blaizot, H. Orland, Phys. Rev. C 24, 1740 (1981).https://doi.org/PRVCAN

  17. 17. S. Levit, J. W. Negele, Z. Paltiel, Phys. Rev. C 21, 1603 (1980); https://doi.org/PRVCAN
    H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. A346, 1 (1980).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  18. 18. S. Levit, J. W. Negele, Z. Paltiel, Phys. Rev. C 22, 1979 (1980); https://doi.org/PRVCAN
    H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. A367, 269 (1981).https://doi.org/NUPBBO

  19. 19. J. Langer, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 54, 258 (1969).https://doi.org/APNYA6

  20. 20. A. K. Kerman, S. Levit, Phys. Rev. C 24, 1029 (1981).https://doi.org/PRVCAN

  21. 21. P. Bonche, S. Levit, D. Vautherin, Nucl. Phys. A427, 278 (1984); https://doi.org/NUPBBO
    P. Bonche, S. Levit, D. Vautherin, A436, 265 (1985).

  22. 22. S. Levit, Phys. Rev. C 21, 1594 (1980); https://doi.org/PRVCAN
    Y. Alhassid, S. E. Koonin, Phys. Rev. C 23, 1590 (1981); https://doi.org/PRVCAN
    R. Balian, M. Vénéroni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1353 (1981).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

More about the Authors

John W. Negele. MIT.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1985_04.jpeg

Volume 38, Number 4

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.