Nonlinear Optics in Quanutm‐Confined Structures

JUN 01, 1993

Experimenters and theorists have combined two new and productive fields of physics—nonlinear optics and quantum confinement—to reveal a host of unusual and useful properties in semiconductor heterostructures.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881354

Daniel S. Chemla

Nonlinear optical effects arise when one applies to a material system optical fields that are on the order of or larger than the atomic fields that exist within the system. Quantum size effects appear when the dimensions of a system become comparable to or even smaller than the natural length scale governing its quantum mechanics. Much recent progress has resulted from the combination of these two very productive areas of physics. Because of advances in semiconductor and laser technologies, it is now possible to apply very intense, ultrashort pulses of light to nanometer‐scale semiconductor heterostructures. These conditions produce many new and exciting effects. This article aims to give the reader a flavor of the status of this quickly evolving field of research, with a special emphasis on the most novel and unexpected results.

References

1. S. Schmitt‐Rink, D. S. Chemla, D. A. B. Miller, Adv. Phys. 38, 89 (1989).https://doi.org/ADPHAH
2. J. B. Stark, W. H. Knox, D. S. Chemla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3033 (1990); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
J. B. Stark, W. H. Knox, D. S. Chemla, 68, 3080 (1992).
J. B. Stark, W. H. Knox, D. S. Chemla, in Optics of Semiconductor Nanostructures, F. Henneberger, S. Schmitt‐Rink, E. Gobel, eds., VCH, Weinheim, Germany (1993), p. 204.
3. W. H. Knox, in Hot Carriers in Semiconductor Nanostructures, J. Shah, ed., Academic, San Diego (1992), p. 313, and refs. therein.
4. J.‐P. Foing, D. Hulin, M. Joffre, M. K. Jackson, J.‐L. Oudar, C. Tanguy, M. Combescot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 110 (1992).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
5. N. Peygahmbarian, H. M. Gibbs, J. L. Jewell, A. Antonetti, A. Migus, D. Hulin, A. Mysyrowicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2433 (1984).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
6. S. Schmitt‐Rink, D. S. Chemla, D. A. B. Miller, Phys. Rev. B 32, 6601 (1985).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
7. I. V. Lerner, Y. E. Lozovik, Sov. Phys. JETP 53, 763 (1981). https://doi.org/SPHJAR
D. Paquet, T. M. Rice, K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. B 32, 5208 (1985).https://doi.org/PRBMDO
8. A. Mysyrowicz, D. Hulin, A. Antonetti, A. Migus, W. T. Masselink, H. Morkoc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2748 (1986). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
A. Von Lehmen, D. S. Chemla, J. E. Zucker, J. Heritage, Opt. Lett. 11, 609 (1986). https://doi.org/OPLEDP
M. Joffre, D. Hulin, A. Antonetti, J. Phys. (Paris) C 5, 537 (1987).
9. S. Schmitt‐Rink, D. S. Chemla, H. Haug, Phys. Rev. B 37, 941 (1998), and refs. therein.https://doi.org/PRBMDO
10. C. Ell, J. F. Muller, K. El‐Sayed, H. Haug, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 304 (1989). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
W. Schafer, Festkorperprobleme: Adv. Solid State Phys. 28, 63 (1988).
11. W. H. Knox, D. S. Chemla, D. A. B. Miller, J. B. Stark, S. Schmitt‐Rink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1189 (1989). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
D. S. Chemla, W. H. Knox, D. A. B. Miller, S. Schmitt‐Rink, J. B. Stark, R. Zimmermann, J. Lumin. 44, 233 (1989).https://doi.org/JLUMA8
12. K. Leo, M. Wegener, J. Shah, D. S. Chemla, E. O. Gobel, T. C. Damen, S. Schmitt‐Rink, W. Schafer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1340 (1990). https://doi.org/PRLTAO
M. Wegener, D. S. Chemla, S. Schmitt‐Rink, W. Schafer, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5675 (1990).https://doi.org/PLRAAN
13. S. Weiss, M.‐A. Mycek, J.‐Y. Bigot, S. Schmitt‐Rink, D. S. Chemla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2685 (1992).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
14. D. S. Kim, J. Shah, T. C. Damen, W. Schafer, F. Jahnke, S. Schmitt‐Rink, K. Kohler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2725 (1992).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
15. J.‐Y. Bigot, M.‐A. Mycek, S. Weiss, R. G. Ulbrich, D. S. Chemla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3307 (1993).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
16. K. Leo, J. Shah, E. O. Gobel, T. C. Damen, S. Schmitt‐Rink, W. Schafer, J. Muller, K. Kohler, Mod Phys. Lett. B 5, 87 (1991).
17. J. Hegarty, M. D. Sturge, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1143 (1985). https://doi.org/JOBPDE
H. Wang, D. G. Steel, Appl. Phys. A 53, 514 (1991).https://doi.org/APSFDB
18. K. L. Hall, G. Lenz, E. P. Ippen, U. Koren, G. Raybon, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 2512(, 1992), and refs. therein.https://doi.org/APPLAB
19. A. E. Paul, R. Binder, S. W. Koch, Phys. Rev. B I 45, 5879 (1992), and refs. therein.
20. J. Feldmann, K. Leo, J. Shah, D. A. B. Miller, J. E. Cunningham, T. Meier, G. vonPlessen, A. Schulze, P. Thomas, S. Schmitt‐Rink, Phys. Rev. B I 46, 7252 (1992).
21. M. Koch, J. Feldmann, G. von. Plessen, E. O. Gobel, P. Thomas, K. Kohler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3631 (1992).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

More about the Authors

Daniel S. Chemla. University of California, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.