Discover
/
Article

Neutron Scattering in Europe

JAN 01, 1985
Major investments in user facilities by Western European countries have led to new scientific applications in areas ranging from spin glasses to the flow of lubricants.
Roger Pynn
Brian E. F. Fender

Neutron scattering began in Europe, as in the United States, as a parasitic activity at nuclear reactors designed to operate as irradiation facilities or to test reactor technology. Through the 1950s and 1960s, research using neutron beams involved only a small number of scientists. Most of these scientists were from the reactor centers, although by the late 1960s the participation of university scientists was apparent, notably at the Munich and Harwell reactors. Nevertheless, the general picture remained one in which neutron‐scattering experiments, which were principally in solid‐state physics, were carried out by small groups of scientists somewhat isolated from the academic and industrial communities. Even when reactors designed to produce neutron beams became available, scientists working on neutron scattering remained relatively isolated.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. For a recent review of neutron‐scattering instrumentation at reactors, see R. Pynn, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 55, 837 (1984).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  2. 2. J. Morse, J. Phys. (Paris) C3, 13 (1984).https://doi.org/JPQCAK

  3. 3. B. Jacrot, Instrumentation for Neutron Inelastic Scattering Research, Panel Proceedings Series, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1970).

  4. 4. B. Alefeld, Sitzungsber. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. Math. Naturwiss. Kl. 11, 109 (1967).

  5. 5. M. Prager, B. Alefeld, A. Heidemann in Proc. XIXth Cong. Magnetic Resonance and Related Phenomena, Ampere, Heidelberg, Geneva (1976), p. 389.

  6. 6. F. Mezei, ed., Neutron Spin Echo, Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1980).

  7. 7. J. S. Higgins, K. Ma, L. K. Nicholson, J. B. Hayter, K. Dodgson, J. A. Semlyen, Polymer 24, 793 (1983).https://doi.org/POLMAG

  8. 8. F. Mezei, P. Dagleish, Commun. Phys. 2, 41 (1977).https://doi.org/COPHDH

  9. 9. D. J. Hughes, M. T. Burgy, Phys. Rev. 81, 498 (1951).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  10. 10. V. F. Turchin, Deposited Paper, USSR Atomic Energy (1967), p. 22.

  11. 11. J. K. Kjems, M. Steiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1137 (1978).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  12. 12. H. A. Mook, D. McK. Paul, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. (1984).

More about the Authors

Roger Pynn. Institut Max von Laue‐Paul Langevin, Grenoble, France.

Brian E. F. Fender. Institut Max von Laue‐Paul Langevin, Grenoble, France.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1985_01.jpeg

Volume 38, Number 1

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.