Discover
/
Article

Multiwire and drift proportional chambers

OCT 01, 1978
These detectors, able to determine trajectory positions to better than 50 microns, now equip nearly every high‐energy physics experiment in which charged particles have to be localized.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2994772

Georges Charpak

In some kinds of experiments, the accurate localization of ionizing particles is essential. Multiwire proportional chambers and drift chambers, first developed in the late 1960’s, are now routine tools in such applications. Although the structure of these detectors is very simple, our understanding of them has evolved rapidly in recent years, as has the variety of modes in which they have been operated. Here we shall consider briefly the operation of these detectors. Then we can proceed to a discussion of the latest developments, which aim to obtain information on the reaction products of the most complex high‐energy collisions, with the utmost accuracy and efficiency. (Detailed descriptions of the detectors and their properties can now be found abundantly in the literature, which is extensively reviewed in references 3 and 4.)

References

  1. 1. G. Charpak, R. Bouclier, T. Bressani, J. Favier, C. Zupancic, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 62, 235 (1968).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  2. 2. G. Charpak, D. Rahm, M. Steiner, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 80, 13 (1970).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  3. 3. F. Sauli, “Principle of operation of multiwire proportional and drift chambers” CERN 77‐09, 1977.

  4. 4. P. Rice‐Evans, Spark, streamer, proportional and drift chambers, Richelieu London (1974).

  5. 5. G. Charpak, Journal de Physique 30, 86 C2 (1969).https://doi.org/JOPQAG

  6. 6. V. Radeka, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐21, 51 (1974).https://doi.org/IETNAE

  7. 7. J. L. Alberi, V. Radeka, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐23, 1, 250 (1976).https://doi.org/IETNAE

  8. 8. G. Charpak, G. Petersen, A. Policarpo, F. Sauli, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 148, 471 (1978).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  9. 9. L. Lederman, Comments on Nuclear and Particle Physics III, 107 (1969).

  10. 10. J. Saudinos, “High Resolution Nuclear Spectroscopy with the Saturn Cyclotron,” Proceedings of the Topical Seminar on Interactions of Elementary Particles with Nuclei, Trieste Sept. 1970 (INFN, Trieste).

  11. 11. J. Saudinos, J. C. Duchazeaubeneix, C. Laspalles, R. Chaminade, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 11, 77 (1973).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  12. 12. G. Charpak, F. Sauli, W. Duinker, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 108, 413 (1973).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  13. 13. A. H. Walenta, J. Heintze, B. Schürlein, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 92, 373 (1971).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  14. 14. J. Fischer, M. Okuno, A. H. Walenta, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 151, 451 (1978).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  15. 15. W. Bertozzi et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods 141, 457 (1977).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  16. 16. Proceedings of the Wire Chamber Conference, Vienna, Austria, February 1978, to be published in Nuclear Instruments and Methods.

  17. 17. A. Breskin, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 141, 505 (1977).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  18. 18. K. Bennet, B. G. Taylor, S. P. McKechnie, D. Ramsden, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 138, 387 (1976).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  19. 19. C. Cork, D. Fehr, R. Hamlin, W. Vernon, N. h. Xuong, V. Perez‐Mendez, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 7, 719 (1974).https://doi.org/JACGAR

  20. 20. Proceedings of the Workshop in X‐ray instrumentation for synchrotron radiation research, April 1978 (H. Winck, G. Brown, eds.), Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, SSRL Report No 78/04.

  21. 21. J. Alberi, J. Fisher, V. Radeka, L. C. Rogers, B. Schoenhorn, “A two‐dimensional position sensitive detector for thermal neutrons,” BNL 19487 (1975).

  22. 22. R. Allemand, J. Bourdel, E. Roudaut, P. Convert, K. Ibel, J. Jacobé, J. P. Cotton, B. Farnoux, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 126, 29 (1975).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  23. 23. V. Perez‐Mendez, “Proportional and drift chambers in applied investigation,” LBL 3851 (1975).

  24. 24. G. Charpak, “Application of proportional chambers to some problems in medicine and biology,” to be published in ref. 16.

More about the Authors

Georges Charpak. CERN, Geneva.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1978_10.jpeg

Volume 31, Number 10

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.