Discover
/
Article

Mössbauer effect

JUL 01, 1967
Recoil‐free gamma radiation is used to study relativistic effects, lattice dynamics and hyperfine interactions in solids. Problems encountered in such work are those of low‐energy nuclear physics and the need for a precise Doppler modulator.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3034398

Gunther K. Wertheim

TODAY NEW DISCOVERIES in physics are rapidly assimilated. Although only nine years have passed since Rudolf Mössbauer submitted his first article, the Mössbauer effect is currently being used in many undergraduate physics laboratories, and four or five manufacturers are offering off‐the‐shelf Mössbauer spectrometers.

References

  1. 1. R. L. Mössbauer, Z. Physik 151, 124 (1958); https://doi.org/ZEPYAA
    R. L. Mössbauer, Naturwiss. 45, 538 (1958); https://doi.org/NATWAY
    R. L. Mössbauer, Z. Naturforsch. 149, 211 (1959).

  2. 2. H. Frauenfelder, Mössbauer Effect, W. A. Benjamin, New York (1962);
    G. K. Wertheim, Mössbauer Effect, Principles and Applications, Academic Press, New York (1964);
    V. I. Goldanskii, The Mössbauer Effect and its Applications in Chemistry, Consultants Bureau, New York (1965);
    R. L. Mössbauer, D. H. Sharp, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 410 (1964).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  3. 3. C. Tzara, R. Barloutaud, Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 405 (1960); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    J. K. Major, Nucl. Phys. 33, 323 (1962); https://doi.org/NUPHA7
    P. J. Black, D. E. Evans, D. A. O’Connor, Proc. Roy. Soc. A270, 168 (1962);
    J. Miller, J. J. Moine, Phys. Letters 2, 50 (1962); https://doi.org/PHLTAM
    S. Bernstein, E. C. Campbell, Phys. Rev. 132, 1625 (1963). https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    P. Debrunner, H. Frauenfelder, p. 58 in Applications of the Mössbauer Effect in Chemistry and Solid State Physics, International Atomic Energy Agency, TRC no. 50, Vienna (1966).

  4. 4. J. Olsen, S. Blow, Am. J. Phys. 32, 893 (1964); https://doi.org/AJPIAS
    C. W. Kocher, Rev. Sci. Instr. 36, 1018 (1965).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  5. 5. A. J. Bearden, P. L. Mattern, P. S. Nobel, Am. J. Phys. 32, 109 (1964).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  6. 6. A. D. Adler, M. Hane, Am. J. Phys. 34, 189 (1966).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  7. 7. A. H. Schoen, p. 40 in The Mössbauer Effect (D. M. J. Compton, A. H. Schoen, eds.) Wiley, New York (1962).

  8. 8. A. J. Bearden, M. G. Hauser, P. L. Mattern, p. 67 in Mössbauer Effect Methodology, Vol. 1 (I. J. Gruverman, ed.) Plenum Press, New York (1965).

  9. 9. K. P. Mitrofanov, Instrum. Expr. Tech. 526 (1965).

  10. 10. R. Booth, C. E. Violet, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 25, 1 (1963).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  11. 11. R. H. Nussbaum, F. Gerstenfeld, J. K. Richardson, Am. J. Phys. 34, 45 (1966).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  12. 12. S. S. Hanna et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 177 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  13. 13. D. Rubin, Rev. Sci. Instr. 33, 1358 (1962); https://doi.org/RSINAK
    R. L. Cohen, P. G. McMullin, G. K. Wertheim, Rev. Sci. Instr. 34, 671 (1963); https://doi.org/RSINAK , Rev. Sci. Instrum.
    P. A. Flinn, Rev. Sci. Instr. , 34, 1422 (1963); https://doi.org/RSINAK , Rev. Sci. Instrum.
    E. Kankeleit, Rev. Sci. Instr. , 35, 194 (1964); https://doi.org/RSINAK , Rev. Sci. Instrum.
    V. Vali, T. W. Nybakken, Rev. Sci. Instr. , 35, 1085 (1964); https://doi.org/RSINAK , Rev. Sci. Instrum.
    J. Lipkin et al., Rev. Sci. Instr. , 35, 1336 (1964); https://doi.org/RSINAK , Rev. Sci. Instrum.
    T. E. Cranshaw, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 30, 101 (1964); https://doi.org/NUIMAL
    L. Lövborg, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. , 34, 307 (1965); https://doi.org/NUIMAL , Nucl. Instrum. Methods
    F. C. Ruegg, J. J. Spijkerman, J. R. DeVoe, Rev. Sci. Instr. 36, 356 (1965); https://doi.org/RSINAK
    F. van der Woude, G. Boom, Rev. Sci. Instr. , 36, 800 (1965); https://doi.org/RSINAK , Rev. Sci. Instrum.
    G. M. Bancroft, A. G. Maddock, J. Ward, Chem. and Ind. 423 (1965);
    R. L. Cohen, Rev. Sci. Instr. 37, 957 (1966); https://doi.org/RSINAK
    M. Bornaz et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 40, 61 (1966); https://doi.org/NUIMAL
    H. Brafman, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. , 42, 245 (1966).https://doi.org/NUIMAL , Nucl. Instrum. Methods

  14. 14. E. Kankeleit, p. 47 in Mössbauer Effect Methodology, Vol. 1 (I. J. Gruverman, ed.) Plenum Press, New York (1965).

  15. 15. D. St. P. Bunbury, J. Sci. Instr. 43, 783 (1966).https://doi.org/JSINAY

  16. 16. R. Zane, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 43, 333 (1966).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  17. 17. R. V. Pound, G. A. RebkaJr, Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 337 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  18. 18. R. Gerson, W. S. Denno, Rev. Sci. Instr. 36, 1344 (1965).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  19. 19. M. Schechter et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 44, 268 (1966).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  20. 20. H. de Waard, Rev. Sci. Instr. 36, 1728 (1965).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  21. 21. R. Zane (to be published).

  22. 22. E. Kankeleit, Am. J. Phys. 34, 778 (1966).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

  23. 23. J. D. Cooper, N. N. Greenwood, J. Sci. Instr. 43, 71 (1966).https://doi.org/JSINAY

  24. 24. R. L. Cohen, Rev. Sci. Instr. 37, 260 (1966); https://doi.org/RSINAK
    R. L. Cohen, Rev. Sci. Instr. , 37, 977 (1966).https://doi.org/RSINAK , Rev. Sci. Instrum.

  25. 25. J. E. S. Bradley, J. Marks, Nature 192, 1176 (1961).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  26. 26. T. Bressani, P. Brovetto, E. Chiavassa, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 47, 164 (1967).https://doi.org/NUIMAL

  27. 27. R. H. Goodman, J. E. Richardson, Rev. Sci. Instr. 37, 283 (1965).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  28. 28. D. A. Shirley, Nucleonics 23, 62, March (1965); https://doi.org/NUCLAM
    T. J. Kennett, PHYSICS TODAY 19, no. 6, 86 (1966); https://doi.org/PHTOAD
    M. B. Glos, Nucleonics 24, 44 (1966); https://doi.org/NUCLAM
    H. R. Bowman et al., Science 151, 562 (1966); https://doi.org/SCIEAS
    J. W. McKenzie, Trans. AIME, March (1967);
    Proceedings of the 10th Scintillation and Semiconductor Counter Symposium, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS‐13, June (1966).https://doi.org/IETNAE

  29. 29. H. Frauenfelder et al., Nuovo Cimento 19, 183 (1961).https://doi.org/NUCIAD

More about the Authors

Gunther K. Wertheim. Bell Labs.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1967_07.jpeg

Volume 20, Number 7

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.