Meson factories

DEC 01, 1966

Accelerators that will produce 500–1000 MeV nucleons and mesons in beams thousands of times more intense than existing machines will be able to do experiments never before possible, increase precision of others and reveal processes now unknown

DOI: 10.1063/1.3047851

Louis Rosen

MESON FACTORIES, which will produce beams of nucleons and mesons thousands of times more intense than those presently available, can be expected to take us to our next level of understanding of nuclear structure and to reveal processes and mechanisms presently hidden from view. By meson factory I mean a complete nuclear‐physics installation based on an accelerator of 500–1000 MeV, which is capable of providing at least 100 microamperes of high quality external beam. All ancillary facilities for performing high precision experiments with the primary and secondary beams are included: targeting, beam transport, data‐handling equipment and beam dumps for the residual beams. Although the energy regime is not novel, the intensity capability is, being about ten thousand times as great as existing synchrocyclotrons; a 1‐microampere, 800‐MeV accelerator is capable of generating pion fluxes in excess of $10^{10} particles / {cm}^{2} / \sec$ in a 6% momentum interval.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. N. Ramsey et al., Report of the Panel on High Energy Accelerator Physics of the General Advisory Comm. to the AEC and the President’s Science Advisory Comm., TID‐18636, 26 April 1963;
Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Comm. to the US AEC, 17 March 1964 (unpublished);
Report of the Working Party on the European High Energy Accelerator Programme, CERN Report FA/WP/23/Rev. 3, June 1963;
H. A. Bethe et al., A Report of the Ad Hoc Panel on Meson Factories to the Office of Science and Technology, March 1964;
A. Bromley et al., Report of the Panel on Intermediate Physics (the Feshbach Report), MIT, Dept. of Phys. Internal Report (unpublished);
Physics: Survey and Outlook, National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council, Washington, D.C. (1966).
2. Proc. of the First National Particle Accelerator Conf., IEEE Trans. on Nucl. Sci. NS‐12, no. 3, June 1965; https://doi.org/IETNAE
V. P. Dzhelepov et al., Soviet Phys.‐Usp. 8, 253–268 (1965); https://doi.org/SOPUAP
Proc. of Int. Conf. on Isochronous Cyclotrons, Gatlinburg Conf., Gatlinburg, Tenn., 12–13 lished;
Advances in Meson and Nuclear Research below 1 BeV, Gatlinburg Conf., Gatlinburg, Tenn., 12–13 Nov. 1962;
A. Zucker, A. H. Snell, PHYSICS TODAY 16, no. 4, 19 (1963).https://doi.org/PHTOAD
3. V. Hughes, Sci. Amer. 214, no. 4, 93 (1966).https://doi.org/SCAMAC
4. M. M. Sternheim, R. Hofstadter, Nuovo Cimento 38, 1854 (1965).https://doi.org/NUCIAD
5. L. Smith, Nucl. Instr. Methods, 18, 19, 397 (1962).https://doi.org/NUIMAL
6. Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Sector‐Focused Cyclotrons, Nucl. Instr. Methods 18, 19 (1962).https://doi.org/NUIMAL
7. J. R. Richardson, Prog. in Nuclear Techniques and Instrumentation, I, 1 (1965).
8. F. M. Russell, Nucl. Instr. Methods 23, 229 (1963); https://doi.org/NUIMAL
R. S. Livingston, Origins and principles of the separated‐orbit cyclotron, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 11, 97 (1966).https://doi.org/BAPSA6
9. L. Smith in Linear Accelerator, Encyclopedia of Physics, Vol. XLIV S. Flügge, ed. (Springer‐Verlag, Berlin 1959), p. 341;
M. S. Livingston, J. P. Blewett, Particle Accelerators, (McGraw‐Hill, New York, 1962).
10. D. Nagle, 1964 Linear Accelerator, Conf. Proc., Midwestern Universities Research Association, MURA Report no. 714, 20–24 July 1964.
11. D. Nagle, E. Knapp, B. C. Knapp, Equivalent circuit representation of linear accelerator tanks (to be published);
E. Knapp, Design construction and testing of rf structures for a proton linear accelerator, IEEE Trans. on Nucl. Sci. NS‐12, 118 (1965); https://doi.org/IETNAE
H. C. Hoyt, D. D. Simonds, W. F. Rich, Computer‐designed 805 MHz proton linac cavities, Rev. Sci. Instr. 37, 755 (1966).https://doi.org/RSINAK

More about the Authors

Louis Rosen. Los Alamos National Laboratory.