Discover
/
Article

Magnetic fields in biology

NOV 01, 1968
Life scientists find many interesting interactions between magnetic fields and biological systems. Ranging from the pure research on magnetotropism to medical applications in the operating room, biomagnetism promises exciting developments.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3034587

Alexander Kolin

SUPERSTITION AND QUACKERY dominated experimentation and speculation on interaction of magnetic fields with living systems for well over a thousand years. More critical inquiry is of relatively recent origin. There is still controversy about a variety of findings, but sound observations and applications of magnetic interactions to biology and medicine are beginning to emerge. Thus, for instance, constant magnetic fields have been shown to affect plant growth and animal development, alternating magnetic fields have been used to stimulate nerves and to evoke visual sensations, and activity of nerves and muscles has been shown to be accompanied by transient magnetic fields. Most advanced is the development of magnetic methods of measurement. These methods include electromagnetic determination of blood flow and magnetic resonance spectrometry of biological molecules.

References

  1. 1. L. J. Audus, Soc. Exp. Biol. 16, 197 (1962).

  2. 2. N. M. Amer, C. A. Tobias, Biophys. Soc. Abstr. 9, 24 (1965).

  3. 3. N. M. Amer, Univ. of Calif. (Berkeley) thesis (1966).

  4. 4. W. C. Levengood, Nature 209, 1009 (1966).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  5. 5. W. C. Levengood, Biophys. J. 7, 297 (1967).https://doi.org/BIOJAU

  6. 6. L. J. Audus, J. C. Which, in Biological Effects of Magnetic Fields, M. F. Barnothy, ed., Plenum Press (1964).

  7. 7. W. Penfield, The Excitable Cortex in Conscious Man (Univ. of Liverpool Press, 1958).

  8. 8. A. Kolin, N. Q. Brill, P. J. Broberg, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med. 102, 251 (1959).

  9. 9. M. d’Arsonval, Comptes Rendus Soc. Biol. Paris 48, 450 (1896).

  10. 10. S. P. Thompson, Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 82, 396 (1910).

  11. 11. H. B. Barlow, H. I. Kohn, E. G. Walsh, Am. J. Physiol. 148, 372 (1946).https://doi.org/AJPHAP

  12. 12. D. Cohen, Science 156, 652 (1967).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  13. 13. J. A. Gengerelli, N. J. Holter, W. R. Glasscock, J. of Psychol. 52, 317 (1961)
    and J. A. Gengerelli, N. J. Holter, W. R. Glasscock, 57, 201 (1964).

  14. 14. J. H. Seipel, R. D. Morrow, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 50, 1 (1960).https://doi.org/JWASA3

  15. 15. D. Cohen, Science 161, 784 (1968).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  16. 16. M. S. Burr, A. Mauro, Yale J. Biol. Med. 21, 457 (1949).https://doi.org/YJBMAU

  17. 17. A. Kolin, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med. 35, 53 (1936).

  18. 18. E. Wetterer, Zeits. Biol. 98, 26 (1937).

  19. 19. A. Kolin, in Medical Physics (Year‐book Publ. 1960), O. Glasser, ed., vol. 2, p. 141.

  20. 20. A. Kolin, in UCLA Forum in the Medical Sciences (Univ. of Calif. Press, 1968), vol. 10.

  21. 21. J. A. Shercliff, Theory of Electromagnetic Flow Measurement (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1962).

  22. 22. G. Ross, A. Kolin, S. Austin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 52, 692 (1964).https://doi.org/PNASA6

  23. 23. A. Kolin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 57, 1331 (1967).https://doi.org/PNASA6

  24. 24. A. Kolin, G. Ross, J. J. Grollman, J. Archer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 59, 808 (1968).https://doi.org/PNASA6

  25. 25. A. Kolin, J. Appl. Phys. 15, 150 (1944).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  26. 26. C. J. Mills, T. Shillingford, Cardiov. Res. 1, 263 (1967).https://doi.org/CVREAU

  27. 27. A. Kolin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 56, 1051 (1966).https://doi.org/PNASA6

  28. 28. A. Kolin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 46, 509 (1960).https://doi.org/PNASA6

  29. 29. A. Kolin, Science 117, 134 (1953).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  30. 30. A. Kolin, in Medical Physics (Year‐book Publ. 1960), O. Glasser, ed., vol. 3, p. 268.

  31. 31. J. Kovalczyk, Electromagnetophoresis in Porous Media Gdansk Polytechnic Institute, Poland, thesis (1966).

  32. 32. W. P. Murphy, W. B. Dandliker, J. W. Keller, Transfusion 1, 367 (1961).

  33. 33. J. R. Singer, Science 130, 1652 (1959) https://doi.org/SCIEAS
    and J. R. Singer, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 125 (1960).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  34. 34. B. Commoner, J. J. Heise, B. B. Lippincott, R. E. Norberg, J. V. Passonneau, J. Townsend, Science 126, 57 (1957).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  35. 35. P. E. Spiegler, ed., Federation Proceedings Supplement, No. 12, Sept.–Oct. (1962).

More about the Authors

Alexander Kolin. University of California, Los Angeles.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1968_11.jpeg

Volume 21, Number 11

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.