Discover
/
Article

Junction lasers

MAR 01, 1971
Slices of semiconductor, formed into tiny, efficient, rugged and inexpensive lasers, combine sophisticated design with mass‐market appeal.
L. A. D'Asaro
José E. Ripper

Junction lasers are devices in which laser action is produced by a high, nonequilibrium concentration of electrons and holes within the same small region of a semiconductor. Why do we want junction lasers? They are interesting not only from the viewpoint of the physics involved; their properties suit them for industrial application as well. The advantages include:

▸ Smallness: Dimensions of the active region are typically one to two microns, with the largest dimension usually no more than a fraction of a millimeter.

▸ Mechanical stability: The mirrors are an integral part of the laser structure, and are usually formed by cleaving the crystal.

▸ High efficiency: Pulsed junction lasers have operated at as much as 40% external quantum efficiency.

▸ Reasonable power: Continuous output of 40 mW has been obtained at room temperature, with much higher powers at low temperatures. The record peakpower output in a 100‐nanosec pulse is about 100 watts.

▸ Versatility: Junction lasers are conveniently pumped with direct current, and their output can be amplitude, frequency or pulse‐position modulated into the GHz range. They can lase at wavelengths from 20 to 0.75 microns with the proper choice of semiconductor alloy, and can operate in a single mode. Within the last year, junction lasers have been operated continuously at room temperature.

References

  1. 1. G. Burns, M. I. Nathan, Proc. IEEE, 52, 770 (1964);
    M. I. Nathan, Proc. IEEE, 54, 1276 (1966);
    C. H. Gooch, Gallium Arsenide Lasers, Interscience, London (1969);
    S. M. Sze. Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Interscience, New York (1969), page 687.

  2. 2. I. Hayashi, M. B. Panish, P. W. Foy, S. Sumski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 17, 109 (1970).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  3. 3. M. G. A. Bernard, G. Duraffourg, Physica Status Solid 1, 699 (1961).

  4. 4. A. K. Jonscher, M. H. Boyle, Gallium Arsenide: 1966 Symposium Proceedings, IPPS, London (1967).

  5. 5. D. K. Wilson, in Radiative Recombination in Semiconductors, Academic, New York (1964), page 171.

  6. 6. W. E. Ahearn, J. W. Crowe, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics QE‐2, 597 (1966).

  7. 7. M. B. Panish, S. Sumski, I. Hayashi, Metallurgical Trans, (to be published).

  8. 8. T. L. Paoli, J. E. Ripper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1085 (1969).

  9. 9. T. L. Paoli, J. E. Ripper, Appl. Phys. Lett. 15, 105 (1969).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  10. 10. G. E. Fenner, Solid‐State Electronics 10, 753 (1967).https://doi.org/SSELA5

  11. 11. J. E. Ripper, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics QE‐5, 391 (1969).

  12. 12. J. E. Ripper, J. C. Dyment, Appl. Phys. Lett. 12, 365 (1968).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  13. 13. J. E. Ripper, T. L. Paoli, J. C. Dyment, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics QE‐6, 300 (1970).

  14. 14. T. L. Paoli, J. E. Ripper, Proc. IEEE 58, 1457 (1970).https://doi.org/IEEPAD

  15. 15. G. E. Fenner, Appl. Phys. Lett. 5, 198 (1964).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  16. 16. G. W. Pratt, J. E. Ripper, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 1525 (1965).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  17. 17. J. M. Besson, J. F. Butler, A. R. Calawa, W. Paul, R. H. Rediker, Appl. Phys. Lett. 7, 206 (1965).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  18. 18. G. W. Pratt Jr, P. G. McMullin, in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conf. on the Physics of Semiconductors, Cambridge, Mass. (1970).

  19. 19. J. F. Butler, T. C. Harman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 12, 347 (1968).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  20. 20. E. D. Hinkley, T. C. Harman, C. Freed, Appl. Phys. Lett. 13, 49 (1968).

  21. 21. E. D. Hinkley, C. Freed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 277 (1969).

  22. 22. J. O. Dimmock, I. Melngailis, A. J. Strauss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 1193 (1966).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  23. 23. J. B. ConklinJr, L. E. Johnson, G. W. PrattJr, Phys. Rev. 137A, 1282 (1965).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  24. 24. T. C. Harman, A. R. Calawa, I. Melngailis, J. O. Dimmock, Appl. Phys. Lett. 14, 333 (1969).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  25. 25. J. F. Butler, Solid State Commun. 7, 909 (1969).https://doi.org/SSCOA4

  26. 26. J. C. Dyment, Appl. Phys. Lett. 10, 84 (1967).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  27. 27. T. L. Paoli, J. E. Ripper, T. H. Zachos, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics QE‐5, 271 (1969).

  28. 28. I. Hayashi, M. B. Panish, F. K. Reinhart, J. Appl. Phys. (to be published).

  29. 29. J. E. Ripper, J. C. Dyment, L. A. D’Asaro, T. L. Paoli, Appl. Phys. Lett. 18, 155 (1971).https://doi.org/APPLAB

  30. 30. J. C.3 Dyment, J. E. Ripper, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics QE‐4, 155 (1968).

More about the authors

L. A. D'Asaro, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill.

José E. Ripper, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1971_03.jpeg

Volume 24, Number 3

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.