Is there a pecking order in physics journals?
DOI: 10.1063/1.3128587
When physicists wish to communicate their work by means of publication, several considerations are weighed before choosing the appropriate journal. There is the matter of audience; of the probable delay between acceptance and publication; of article format (letter, review, standard research report). If the article is potentially controversial, the author may estimate its chances of being accepted by different journals. Considerations of national pride may sway the choice: An author may submit a work to a journal in his own country rather than to one that has a greater circulation and impact but is published in a foreign country.
This article is only available in PDF format
References
1. C. C. Chen, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 23, 254 (1972).
2. R. L. Kenyon, R. N. Hader, J. Chem. Doc. 5, 135 (1965).https://doi.org/JCHDAN
3. O. E. Sheppard, J. Chem. Ed. 12, 472 (1935).https://doi.org/JCEDA8
4. R. L. Barrett, M. A. Barrett, J. Chem. Ed. 34 (1) 35 (1957).https://doi.org/JCEDA8
5. S. Mizushima, Bussei 12, 214 (1971).
6. M. M. Kessler, NBS Mis. Pub. 269, 15 Dec. 1965, Wash., D.C.; page 193.
7. J. Martyn, A. Gilchrist, “An Evaluation of British Scientific Journals,” Aslib, London (1968).
8. L. J. Anthony, H. East, M. J. Slater, Rep. Prog. Phys. 32, 709 (1969).https://doi.org/RPPHAG
9. F. Narin, M. Carpenter, N. C. Berlt, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 23, 323 (1972).
10. For a bibliography of the use of citations in the analysis of science see “Science Citation Index 1972—Source Index,” Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia (1973).
11. E. Garfield, Science 178, 471 (1972).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
12. H. W. Koch, Science 174, 918 (1971).https://doi.org/SCIEAS
13. See reference 10, page 19.
More about the authors
Herbert Inhaber, Policy Analyst, Science Policy Branch, Planning and Finance Service, of Environment Canada, Ottawa.
