Discover
/
Article

Infants note the notes

JUL 01, 2017
Perceiving pitch differences requires the brain to process complex sounds. Remarkably, three-month-old infants with immature brains can hear a wrong note in the children’s song “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star.”

DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.3637

PTO.v70.i7.78_1.d1.jpg
Bonnie K. Lau
PTO.v70.i7.78_1.d2.jpg
Manson Ng

Pitches are the musical ingredients used for cooking up a good melody. Scientists have long known that pitch is important, not just for perceiving music but also for understanding speech and hearing in noisy environments. But we are still debating how the brain encodes pitch. Neuroimaging studies show activation of the auditory cortex when pitches are presented to adults, so that region of the brain would appear to be involved in pitch processing. Babies do not have a fully developed auditory cortex, but our group’s work at the University of Washington shows that they can nonetheless perceive pitch.

Tones without fundamentals

When an instrument plays a note, it produces a complex sound wave made up of multiple harmonics. The lowest harmonic, or fundamental frequency, carries the pitch, and the harmonic composition determines the note’s timbre. Timbre is the quality that makes a trumpet sound different from a violin.

In our most recent experiment, we tested three-month-old, seven-month-old, and adult participants to see if they could discern a wrong note in the melody of “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star” (see figure 1). One of the biggest challenges in such work is to tease out whether a participant is responding to pitch or other spectral cues, such as the frequency near which spectral energy is concentrated. To help ensure that our participants were indeed responding to pitch, we exploited a classic phenomenon: perception of the missing fundamental. For each tone we played, we filtered out the frequency component that corresponds to its pitch—that is, the fundamental frequency.

PTO.v70.i7.78_1.f1.jpg

Figure 1. Test tunes. In our experiment on melody discrimination, adult and infant participants repeatedly listened to the first few notes of the tune “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star.” They learned to respond when they heard the “change melody” with the wrong note shown in the red box. We presented many timbre variations so that timbre would not be a reliable cue for the discrimination task.

View larger

You might think that listeners would not perceive pitch in a tone missing its fundamental frequency. But that is not the case, as you can confirm for yourself at, for example, the Auditory Neuroscience webpage www.auditoryneuroscience.com/?q=topics/missing-fundamental . In fact, you effortlessly hear missing fundamental pitch every day. For instance, when listening to someone on the telephone, you can hear the pitch of their voice even though the fundamental frequency is not transmitted. In our melody-discrimination experiment and in earlier work, we used stimuli with missing fundamentals to test whether the infant brain can integrate information from the higher harmonics to produce a perception of pitch (see Physics Today, October 2014, page 18 ). If the infants were responding on the basis of the tones’ spectral components, they would not succeed at their experimental task.

Even though we used tones with missing fundamentals, it is still conceivable that participants were responding to timbre. We therefore randomly varied the timbre for each note. That made the melodies sound as if a different instrument played each one, but it did not alter the pitch of any of them. Therefore, the pitch contour of the melody remained the same. Because of those constantly occurring timbre variations, if participants were responding to timbre rather than pitch, they would get confused—a phenomenon we in fact saw with some adult listeners.

Babies perceive relative pitch

Infants, of course, can’t tell us what they hear, so in our experiment, we assessed auditory perception by observing participants’ responses to the sounds they heard. During testing, infants sat on a caregiver’s lap and, as shown in figure 2a, an assistant manipulated toys to keep the infant attentive and facing in the appropriate direction. At the beginning of our hour-long experimental sessions, we repeatedly played the first seven notes of the melody “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star.” To ensure there were no rhythmic cues, we made all the notes the same duration, 650 ms long, and we always placed a 500 ms pause between successive notes.

PTO.v70.i7.78_1.f2.jpg

Figure 2. Babies in a booth. Infants participating in our experiment sat on a caregiver’s lap inside a sound-attenuated booth. (a) An assistant made sure the infant was attentive and facing in the appropriate direction. The infant heard sound through an insert ear tip, but no one else heard what the infant was listening to—the caregiver listened to music and the assistant was receiving instructions from an experimenter who was outside the booth. The experimenter judged whether the infant was presented an altered melody by observing his or her behavior. Common infant responses included head turns or eye darts toward a mechanical animal (b) that had previously been used in a conditioning phase. Adult participants sat alone in the booth. Since infants were not given verbal instructions, the adults got only vague instructions to “raise their hand when they heard the sound change that turns the toys on.” Otherwise, infant and adult testing was the same.

View larger

The participants’ task in the experimental trials was to listen for a “change melody” that contained a wrong note. During an initial conditioning phase, the change melody was always followed by the activation of a mechanical toy (see figure 2b). That phase was concluded once the experimenter could reliably decide, based on observations of the participant’s behavior, whether a change melody had been played. After completing the conditioning phase, the participants moved on to a test phase in which the toys were activated only when the experimenter correctly determined that a change melody had occurred. In this phase, the toys served as reinforcers to keep the participants responding.

Melodies are built from pitches, and it is possible to listen to a melody and attend to just the absolute pitch cues—the fundamental of each note, independent of the other notes. But what really makes a melody is the pitch relations between its notes. After all, when your hear a melody transposed into a different musical key, you still recognize it even though the absolute pitch of the notes has changed. Melody discrimination requires you to attend to the relative pitch cues that convey the pitch contour.

Past studies had shown that babies can respond to absolute or relative pitch cues depending on the task they are given, so we tested our participants in two ways. In the first set of tests, we always presented “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star” in the same key—that is, the pitches stayed the same. In that case, participants had access to both absolute and relative pitch cues. In the second set, we transposed the tune into two additional keys. Each melody presented was randomly selected from one of the three transpositions so that the absolute pitch cues were no longer useful. In both cases, babies were able to discriminate the melodies. In particular, their success in the second set of trials shows that they can use relative pitch cues to extract the melodic contour.

Timbre confusion—it’s an adult thing

Babies learned to associate a wrong note with an activated toy more readily than adults. Most of the infants passed the conditioning phase of our experiment on their first attempt. Many of the adult participants required additional repetitions of the conditioning phase to learn the task, and some couldn’t learn it at all. In the presence of constant timbre change, it appears, some adults have difficulty isolating a changed note and associating it with a reinforcer. Previous studies, including work from our own lab, had also found that adults have difficulty responding to pitch amidst timbre variation. We do not yet understand why such timbre confusion does not affect infants.

Our study indicates that by three months, babies can integrate information from higher harmonics to form a perception of pitch and use it to discriminate musical melodies such as “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star” from a change melody with one note altered. The ability of three-month-old infants to perceive pitch suggests that subcortical processing without the involvement of the auditory cortex may be sufficient to encode pitch in the developing auditory system. And now that we know that normal-hearing infants can utilize pitch from such a young age, we may be able to more reliably diagnose infants with impaired pitch perception.

This work was conducted in collaboration with Monika-Marie Oster, Kaylah Lalonde, and Lynne A. Werner. We thank the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders for support.

References

  1. ► B. K. Lau, K. Lalonde, M.-M. Oster, L. A. Werner, “Infant pitch perception: Missing fundamental melody discrimination,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141, 65 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4973412

  2. ► B. K. Lau, L. A. Werner, “Perception of missing fundamental pitch by 3- and 4-month-old human infants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 3874 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4763991

More about the Authors

Bonnie Lau is a postdoctoral fellow at the Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences at the University of Washington in Seattle. Manson Ng is a University of Washington alumnus with a master’s degree in computer science and engineering.

This Content Appeared In
pt_cover0717_no_label.jpg

Volume 70, Number 7

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.