The discovery of what we have ever since called the “Josephson effect” took place while I was visiting Cambridge, England, for a sabbatical year in 1961–62. Recently, when I travelled to Kyoto to accept the London Prize on Brian Josephson’s behalf, I put together some reminiscences of that period, which may be more interesting than a mere recapitulation of the bare scientific facts. Lest I appear too central to this account, I should make it clear that at least two other people could have told a similar story from their own points of view. They are Brian Pippard, Josephson’s thesis advisor while the work was being done, and David Shoenberg, director at that time of the Mond Laboratory in which Josephson was a research student in experimental physics and where I served as nominal head of the solid‐state theory group.
This article is only available in PDF format
References
1. M. H. Cohen, L. M. Falicov, J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 316 (1962).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
7. R. L. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, J. E. Mercereau, A. H. Silver, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 159 (1964) and R. L. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, J. E. Mercereau, A. H. Silver, 12, 274 (1964); R. L. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, J. E. Mercereau, A. H. Silver, Phys. Rev. 140, A1628 (1965), and other papers by members of the same group.
9. Y. B. Kim, C. F. Hempstead, A. R. Strnad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 306 (1962) and Y. B. Kim, C. F. Hempstead, A. R. Strnad, 13, 794 (1964); https://doi.org/PRLTAO, Phys. Rev. Lett. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 309 (1962); https://doi.org/PRLTAO P. L. Richards, P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 540 (1965).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
10. W. H. Parker, B. N. Taylor, D. N. Langenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 287 (1967).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
12. C. C. Grimes, P. L. Richards, S. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 431 (1966); https://doi.org/PRLTAO A. H. Dayem, C. C. Grimes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 9, 47 (1966).https://doi.org/APPLAB
Apprehension about career pathways and research funding dominated the list of concerns expressed by physics and astronomy undergraduates in a recent survey.
Cognizant of their role within the scientific community, scientific societies had to weigh how to respond to the actions by the Atomic Energy Commission.
May 14, 2026 02:06 PM
This Content Appeared In
Volume 23, Number 11
Get PT newsletters in your inbox
PT The Week in Physics
A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.
One email per week
PT New Issue Alert
Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.
One email per month
PT Webinars & White Papers
The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.