Discover
/
Article

High‐speed rotation

JUL 01, 1959
The following article is based on Prof. Beams’ Retiring Presidential Address before the American Physical Society, presented at its annual meeting in New York City on January 29, 1959.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3060885

J. W. Beams

Upon this occasion the speaker usually reviews some scientific or technical subject with which he is or has been associated or he discusses current problems involving the role of physics in human affairs. Although the latter subject certainly is most timely and important, I shall address myself to the former. I will attempt to discuss some applications of high‐speed rotation to science with special emphasis upon problems of centrifuging. No effort will be made to review adequately the subject or to emphasize the most important work done in the field. Instead I will discuss some of the work that has interested me personally. Unfortunately time is not available to mention properly all of my collaborators and students to whom should go most of the credit for the work.

References

  1. 1. E. O. Lawrence, J. W. Beams, and W. D. German, Phys. Rev. 31, 1112 (1928).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  2. 2. E. Henriot and E. Huguenard, Comptes Rendus 180, 1389 (1925).https://doi.org/COREAF

  3. 3. J. W. Beams, Rev. Sci. Instr. 1, 667 (1930). https://doi.org/RSINAK
    J. W. Beams and A. J. Weed, Science 74, 44 (1931).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  4. 4. J. W. Beams, Phys. Rev. 35, 24 (1930); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    J. W. Beams, J. Appl. Phys. 8, 795 (1937).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  5. 5. T. Svedberg, Colloid Chemistry (Chem. Cat. Co., 1928) second edition;
    T. Svedberg and K. O. Pederson, The Ultracentrifuge (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1940).

  6. 6. H. W. Beams and R. L. King, Anat. Rec. 59, 363 (1934).https://doi.org/ANREAK

  7. 7. E. N. Harvey, J. Appl. Phys. 9, 68 (1938); https://doi.org/JAPIAU
    E. N. Harvey, Biol. Bull. 66, 48 (1934).

  8. 8. J. W. Beams, E. G. Pickels, and A. J. Weed, J. Chem. Phys. 2, 143 (1934).https://doi.org/JCPSA6

  9. 9. J. W. McBain and C. M. O’Sullivan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 57, 2631 (1935).https://doi.org/JACSAT

  10. 10. E. G. Pickels and J. W. Beams, Science 81, 342 (1935); https://doi.org/SCIEAS
    J. W. Beams and E. G. Pickels, Rev. Sci. Instr., 6, 299 (1935).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  11. 11. J. W. Beams, J. Appl. Phys. 8, 795 (1937); https://doi.org/JAPIAU
    J. W. Beams, Revs. Modern Phys. 10, 245 (1938); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    J. W. Beams, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 43, 177 (1942); https://doi.org/ANYAA9
    J. W. Beams, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 37, 221 (1947); https://doi.org/JWASA3
    J. W. Beams, Rev. Sci. Instr. 9, 413 (1938).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  12. 12. J. W. Beams and L. B. Snoddy, Science 85, 185 (1937).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  13. 13. C. Skarstrom and J. W. Beams, Rev. Sci. Instr. 11, 398, (1940).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  14. 14. F. A. Lindemann and F. W. Aston, Phil. Mag. [6], 37, 523 (1919).https://doi.org/PHMAA4

  15. 15. R. S. Mulliken, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 44, 1033, 1729 (1922); https://doi.org/JACSAT
    R. S. Mulliken, 45, 1592 (1923).https://doi.org/JACSAT , J. Am. Chem. Soc.

  16. 16. S. Chapman, Phil. Mag. [6], 38, 182 (1919); https://doi.org/PHMAA4
    S. Chapman, Phil. Trans. A217, 115 (1918).https://doi.org/PTRMAD

  17. 17. W. D. Harkins, J. Frank. Inst. 194, 783 (1922).https://doi.org/JFINAB

  18. 18. J. Joly and J. H. J. Pool, Phil. Mag. [6] 39, 372 (1920); https://doi.org/PHMAA4
    J. H. J. Pool, Phil. Mag. [6], 41, 818 (1921).https://doi.org/PHMAA4

  19. 19. J. W. Beams and F. B. Haynes, Phys. Rev. 50, 491 (1936).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  20. 20. J. W. Beams and A. V. Masket, Phys. Rev. 51, 384 (1937).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  21. 21. J. W. Beams and C. Skarstrom, Phys. Rev. 56, 266 (1939).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  22. 22. R. F. Humphreys, Phys. Rev. 56, 684 (1939).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  23. 23. F. C. Armstead, F. C. Bader, B. C. Belden, H. Carr, A. K. Cocke, C. Hutchison, F. L. Hereford, F. T. Holmes, L. G. Hoxton, M. Irby, W. C. Johnson, A. R. Kuhlthau, A. C. Lapsley, J. H. McQueen, F. W. Linke, A. K. Mann, J. W. Moore, E. P. Ney, M. L. Randolph, C. S. Simons, P. Sommer, and J. L. Young, III. In addition, A. O. Nier of the University of Minnesota, L. J. Briggs of the National Bureau of Standards, a group working at Columbia directed by H. C. Urey, a group at Westinghouse directed by F. C. Rushing, and a group at the Standard Oil Development Co. directed by E. V. Murphree gave us most valuable help.

  24. 24. J. W. Beams, L. B. Snoddy, and A. R. Kuhlthau, Second UN Int. Conf. on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Sept. 1958.

  25. 25. K. Cohen, Theory of Isotope Separation (McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, 1951).

  26. 26. F. T. Holmes, Rev. Sci. Instr. 8, 444 (1937).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  27. 27. F. T. Holmes and J. W. Beams, Nature 140, 30 (1937).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  28. 28. C. S. Smith, Rev. Sci. Instr. 12, 15 (1941).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  29. 29. L. E. MacHattie, Rev. Sci. Instr. 12, 429 (1941).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  30. 30. J. W. Beams, J. L. Young, III, and J. W. Moore, J. Appl. Phys. 17, 886 (1946).https://doi.org/JAPIAU

  31. 31. J. W. Beams, Science 120, 619 (1954).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  32. 32. J. W. Beams, E. C. Smith, and J. M. Watkins, Soc. Mot. Pic. Tel. Engs. 53, 159 (1952).

  33. 33. J. W. Beams, J. D. Ross, and J. F. Dillon, Rev. Sci. Instr. 22, 77 (1951).https://doi.org/RSINAK

  34. 34. J. W. Beams, H. M. Dixon, III, A. Robeson, and N. Snidow, J. Phys. Chem. 59, 915 (1955).https://doi.org/JPCHAX

  35. 35. J. W. Beams, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 101, 63 (1957).https://doi.org/PAPCAA

  36. 36. W. J. Archibald, Private Communication.

  37. 37. J. W. Beams, J. B. Breazeale, and W. L. Bart, Phys. Rev. 100, 1657 (1955).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  38. 38. J. W. Beams, 43rd Tech. Proc. Am. Electroplaters Soc. (1956).

More about the Authors

J. W. Beams. University of Virginia.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1959_07.jpeg

Volume 12, Number 7

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.