Discover
/
Article

High‐energy physics: Round‐table discussion

NOV 01, 1964
The special session on high‐energy physics at the APS Washington meeting concluded with the following roundtable discussion. Opening statements from each panelist precede questions and comments from the audience. Frederick Seitz served as moderator.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3051225

C. N. Yang
E. L. Goldwasser
Val Fitch
A. M. Weinberg
Owen Chamberlain
G. E. Pake
Maurice Goldhaber
Milton White

C. N. Yang: We have just heard three speakers describing to us various problems which arise in theoretical and experimental high‐energy physics, and in the designs of high‐energy accelerators. The problem of the aims, prospects, and the impact of the whole enterprise is a very complex subject. I shall confine myself to a few remarks concerning the historical aspect of the subject. High‐energy physics is a natural continuation of the traditional efforts by physicists to study the structure of matter. By all standards of comparison, I think we are not exaggerating when we say that achievements in this line of research have been most spectacular in the past sixty years. At the turn of the century, physicists, as we recall, were just looking at the structure of atoms. Thirty years later, the subject of studies progressed to atomic nuclei, and today we are looking at subnuclear constituents. The increase in energy is equally impressive; in fact, perhaps even more so. We have progressed from a few electron volts to millions of electron volts to today’s multibillion electron volts. Reviewing the progress of the experimental techniques that have made possible these investigations, one is deeply impressed by the power and the ingenuity that were brought to bear at each stage of this development. With the greatly awakened interest in science in all nations, with the rapid progress of technology, there seems to be little doubt that new experimental techniques will be developed to meet every new challenge encountered in this enterprise. The impact of these developments on technology, on human affairs, and on other sciences has been important beyond description.

More about the Authors

C. N. Yang. Institute for Advanced Study.

E. L. Goldwasser. University of Illinois.

Val Fitch. Princeton University.

A. M. Weinberg. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Owen Chamberlain. University of California, Berkeley.

G. E. Pake. Washington University, Louis.

Maurice Goldhaber. Brookhaven National Laboratory.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1964_11.jpeg

Volume 17, Number 11

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.