Heavy ions–looking ahead

APR 01, 1973

Beyond producing superheavy nuclides, a new heavy‐ion accelerator could benefit fundamental nuclear physics and chemistry, atomic and solid‐state physics, and astrophysics.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3128017

Joseph H. Hamilton

Ivan A. Sellin

Interest and excitement in many areas of physics and chemistry are growing as the research opportunities that would be offered by a universal heavy‐ion accelerator begin to be appreciated. Advances made possible with existing beams—of carbon, oxygen, sulfur and argon—have stimulated the imagination of scientists who contemplate what would be possible with an accelerator allowing nuclear reactions all the way up to $U^{238}$ on $U^{238}$ to be studied.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. PHYSICS TODAY, July 1972 (page 18).
2. J. R. Nix, PHYSICS TODAY, April 1972 (page 30).
3. Proceedings of the ORNL Heavy‐Ion Summer Study. USAEC report no. Conf.‐720669 (Available from National Technical Information Services, US Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, Va.)
4. W. Greiner, “Electrodynamics of Strong Fields and Its Possible Test in Heavy‐Ion Collisions,” reference 3;
B. Müller, H. Peitz, J. Rafelski, W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1235 (1972).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
5. P. Mokler, H. Stein, P. Armbruster, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 827 (1972).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
6. D. A. Bromley, J. A. Kuehner, E. Almqvist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 365 (1960); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
D. A. Bromley, J. A. Kuehner, E. Almqvist, Phys. Rev. 123, 878 (1961).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
7. R. Stokstad, D. Shapira, L. Chua, P. Parker, M. W. Sachs, R. Wieland, D. A. Bromley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1523 (1972).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
8. W. Greiner, “Nuclear Molecules, Compression of Nuclear Matter and Deformations in Heavy‐Ion Collisions,” reference 3.
9. R. A. Sorensen, “High Angular Momentum States,” reference 3.
10. F. Stephens, “High Angular Momentum States and Heavy‐Ion In‐Beam Spectroscopy,” reference 3.
11. A. W. Sunyar, “Measurement of High Spin States of Nuclei Produced by Heavy‐Ion Reactions,” reference 3.
12. B. R. Mottelson, J. G. Valatin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 511 (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
13. K. Kumar, Proceedings of Conference on High‐Spin Nuclear States and Related Phenomena, Stockholm 1972.
14. K. Alder, “Coulomb interactions with Heavy Ions,” reference 3.
15. F. K. McGowan, “Some Nuclear Structure Results from Coulomb Excitation,” reference 3.
16. F. K. McGowan, C. E. BemisJr, J. L. C. FordJr, W. T. Milner, R. L. Robinson, P. H. Stelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1741 (1971).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
17. E. Eichler, N. R. Johnson, R. O. Sayer, D. C. Hensley, L. L. Riedinger, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.
18. R. A. Sorensen, “Predicted Properties of Nuclei Far from the Stability Line,” reference 3.
19. P. G. Hansen, “New Physics from Study of Nuclear Properties Far from Stability by Use of On‐Line Isotope Separators,” reference 3.
20. J. Bonn, G. Huber, H. J. Kluge, L. Kugler, E. W. Otten, Phys. Lett. 38B, 308 (1972).https://doi.org/PYLBAJ
21. H. Kopferman, Kernmoments Akad. Vert.‐Ges. m.b.H., Leipzig (1940).
22. A. G. Artukh, V. V. Avdeichikov, J. Erö, G. F. Gridnev, V. L. Mikheev, V. V. Volkov, J. Wilczynski, International Conference on the Properties of Nuclei Far From the Region of Beta Stability, CERN 70‐30.
23. T. D. Thomas, “Formation of the Compound Nucleus and its Decay, High Excitation Energies and High Angular Momentum,” reference 3.
24. M. Blann, “Compound Nucleus Reactions Far from Valley of Stability,” reference 3.
25. U. Mosel, “The Two Center Model in Fission and Heavy‐Ion Physics,” reference 3.
26. J. J. Griffin, reference 3 (discussions following paper by Mosel).
27. L. Wilets, E. Guth, J. S. Tenn, Phys. Rev. 156, 1349 (1967).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
28. V. M. Strutinski, Nucl. Phys. A95, 420 (1967); https://doi.org/NUPBBO
V. M. Strutinski, A122, 1 (1968).https://doi.org/NUPBBO , Nucl. Phys.
29. S. G. Nilsson, C. F. Tsang, A. Sobiczewski, S. Szymanski, S. Wycech, C. Gustafson, I. L. Lamm, P. Möller, B. Nilsson, Nucl. Phys. A131, 1 (1969); https://doi.org/NUPBBO
M. Bolsterli, E. O. Fiset, J. R. Nix, J. L. Norton, Phys. Rev. C5, 1050 (1972); https://doi.org/PRVCAN
H. C. Pauli, T. Ledergerber, Nucl. Phys. A175, 545 (1971); https://doi.org/NUPBBO
M. Brack, J. Damgaard, A. S. Jensen, H. C. Pauli, V. M. Strutinski, C. Y. Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 320 (1972).https://doi.org/RMPHAT
30. D. Scharnweber, W. Greiner, U. Mosel, Nucl. Phys. A164, 257 (1971); https://doi.org/NUPBBO
U. Mosel, H. W. Schmitt, Nucl. Phys. A165, 73 (1971); https://doi.org/NUPBBO
U. Mosel, H. W. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. C4, 2185 (1972).https://doi.org/PRVCAN
31. H. W. Schmitt, U. Mosel, Nucl. Phys. A186, 1 (1972).https://doi.org/NUPBBO
32. M. G. Mustafa, U. Mosel, H. W. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. C (in press);
also Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1536 (1972).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
33. P. B. Price, R. L. Fleischer, R. M. Walker, E. L. Hubbard, Proceedings of the Third Conference on Reactions Between Complex Nuclei, Univ. of Calif. Press, Berkeley, Calif. (1963), page 332.
34. F. Becchetti, “Experimental Situation on Nucleon Transfer Between Heavy Ions,” reference 3.
35. Three relevant review papers, by M. Leventhal, R. Marrus and I. A. Sellin, respectively, will appear in the Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Beam‐Foil Spectroscopy, to be published in Nucl. Inst. and Meth.;
also papers by L. Cocke, B. Curnutte and J. Macdonald in the same Proceedings.
36. H. W. Schnopper, H. D. Betz, J. P. Delvaille, K. Kalata, A. R. Sohval, K. W. Jones, H. E. Wegner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 898 (1972).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
37. O. L. Keller, “Predicted Chemical Properties of Superheavy Elements,” reference 3.

More about the authors

Joseph H. Hamilton, Vanderbilt University.

Ivan A. Sellin, University of Tennessee.