Discover
/
Article

Health Effects of Low‐Level Ionizing Radiation

AUG 01, 1991
BEIR V—the National Research Council’s fifth committee on the biological effects of ionizing radiation—found the population’s risk of injury to be somewhat larger than estimated previously.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881267

Arthur C. Upton

The effects of ionizing radiation have received greater study than those of any other environmental agent. Within months after Wilhelm Roentgen’s discovery of the x ray in 1895, early radiation workers experienced injurious effects of overexposure to radiation. In the century since, the study of such effects has received continuing impetus from the expanding use of radiation in medicine, science and industry and from the peaceful and military applications of nuclear energy.

References

  1. 1. A. C. Upton, in Radiation Carcinogenesis, A. C. Upton, R. E. Albert, F. Burns, R. E. Shore, eds., Elsevier, New York (1986), p. 1.

  2. 2. D. E. Lea, Actions of Radiations on Living Cells, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, England (1947).
    H. J. Muller, in High Energy Radiation, Radiation Biology 1, A. Hollaender, ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York (1954), p. 475.

  3. 3. Natl. Acad. Sci., Advisory Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, “The Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation,” Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, D.C. (1956).

  4. 4. Med. Res. Council, “The Hazards to Man of Nuclear and Allied Radiations,” Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London (1956).

  5. 5. United Nations Sci. Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Official Records of the General Assembly, 13th Session, suppl. 17 (A/3838), UN, New York (1958).

  6. 6. Natl. Res. Council, Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations (BEIR V), “Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation,” Natl. Acad. P., Washington, D.C. (1990).

  7. 7. United Nations Sci. Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, “Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation,” report to the General Assembly, with annexes, UN, New York (1988).

  8. 8. Int. Commission on Radiological Protection, “Nonstochastic Effects of Radiation,” ICRP publ. 41, Pergamon, Oxford (1984).

  9. 9. United Nations Sci. Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, “Genetic and Somatic Effects of Ionizing Radiation,” report to the General Assembly, with annexes, UN, New York (1986).

  10. 10. Int. Atomic Energy Agency, “Biological Dosimetry: Chromosomal Aberration Analysis for Dose Assessment,” technical report series 260, IAEA, Vienna (1986).

  11. 11. M. J. Gardner, M. P. Snee, A. J. Hall, C. A. Powell, S. Downes, J. D. Terell, Br. Med. J. 300, 423 (1990).https://doi.org/BMJOAE

  12. 12. Y. Yoshimoto, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 264, 596 (1990).https://doi.org/JAMAAP

  13. 13. S. Abrahamson, Radiat. Res. 123, 237 (1990).https://doi.org/RAREAE

  14. 14. P. Cook‐Mozaffari, S. Darby, R. Doll, Lancet ii, 1145 (1989).

  15. 15. L. Kinlen, Lancet ii, 1323 (1988).

  16. 16. S. Jablon, Z. Hrubec, J. Boice, “Cancer in Populations Living Near Nuclear Facilities,” NIH publ. 90‐874, Natl. Cancer Inst, Natl. Inst. Health, Washington, D.C. (1990).

  17. 17. Natl. Res. Council, Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR III), “The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation,” Natl. Acad. P., Washington, D.C. (1980).

  18. 18. Int. Commission on Radiological Protection, Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP publ. 26, Ann. ICRP 1(3), Pergamon, Oxford (1977).

  19. 19. Y. Shimizu, H. Kato, W. J. Schull, Radiat. Res. 121, 120 (1990).https://doi.org/RAREAE

  20. 20. Natl. Res. Council, Advisory Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations (BEIR I), “The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiations,” Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, D.C. (1972).

  21. 21. United Nations Sci. Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, “Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation,” report to the General Assembly, with annexes, UN, New York (1977).

  22. 22. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Health Effects Model for Nuclear Power Plant Accident Consequence Analysis,” NUREG/CR‐4214, Nuclear Regulatory Commission contractor report SAND85‐7185, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1985).

More about the Authors

Arthur C. Upton. Institute of Environmental Medicine, New York University Medical Center, New York City.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1991_08.jpeg

Volume 44, Number 8

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.