Frontiers of laser development

MAR 01, 1971

Supersonic gas flow, organic dyes and chemical reactions are among the systems exploited in the search for more power, narrower linewidths and greater tunability.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3022623

John L. Emmett

Early lasers had an extremely limited range of operational parameters, and so were of only limited usefulness. Now, however, laser action has been achieved in almost everything from semiconductor diodes to quinine water. What are some of the results of 12 years of laser research?

This article is only available in PDF format

References

1. J. Wilson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 8, 159 (1966).https://doi.org/APPLAB
2. A. E. Hill, Appl. Phys. Lett. (to be published).
3. E. T. Gerry, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 15, 563 (1970).https://doi.org/BAPSA6
4. N. G. Basov, A. N. Oraevskii, Sov. Phys.—JETP 17, 1171 (1963);
J. R. Hurle, A. Hertzberg, Phys. Fluids 8, 1601 (1965).https://doi.org/PFLDAS
5. T. H. Maiman, Nature 187, 493 (1960).https://doi.org/NATUAS
6. N. G. Basov, paper presented at the Fifth International Quantum Electronics Conf., Miami, Fla. (1968).
7. Laser Focus, Oct. 1969, page 14;
G. W. Gobeli, J. C. Bushnell, P. S. Perrcy, E. D. Jones, Phys. Rev. 188, 300 (1969).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
8. A. E. Hill, Appl. Phys. Lett. 12, 324 (1968).https://doi.org/APPLAB
9. G. J. Dezenberg, W. B. McKnight, L. N. McClusky, E. L. Ray, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics, QE‐6, no. 10, 652 (1970).
10. A. J. Beaulieu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 16, 504 (1970).
11. R. Dumanchin, J. C. Farcy, J. Michon, J. Rocca Serra, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Quantum Electronics Conf., Kyoto, Japan (1970).
12. J. V. Kasper, G. C. Pimentel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 352 (1965).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
13. P. H. Cornell, G. C. Pimentel, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 1379 (1968).https://doi.org/JCPSA6
14. D. J. Spencer, H. Mirels, T. A. Jacobs, R. W. F. Gross, Appl. Phys. Lett. 16, 235 (1970).https://doi.org/APPLAB
15. T. A. Cool, R. R. Stephens, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 5175 (1969).https://doi.org/JCPSA6
16. R. J. Hodgson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 494 (1970).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
17. R. W. Waynant, J. D. Shipman, R. C. Elton, A. W. Ali, Appl. Phys. Lett. 17, 383 (1970).https://doi.org/APPLAB
18. P. A. Bazhulin, I. N. Knyazev, G. G. Petrash, Sov. Phys.—JETP 21, 649 (1965).https://doi.org/SPHJAR
19. A. W. Ali, A. C. Kolb, Appl. Phys. Lett. 13, 259 (1968); https://doi.org/APPLAB
A. W. Ali, Catholic University of America, Dept. of Space Science and Appl. Phys. Report 68‐009, Oct. 1968.
20. J. D. Shipman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 10, 3 (1967).https://doi.org/APPLAB
21. P. P. Sorokin, J. R. Lankard, IBM J. Res. Devel. 10, 162, March 1966.
22. B. B. Snavely, F. P. Shäfer, Phys. Lett. 28A, 728 (1969).
23. R. Pappalardo, H. Samelson, A. Lempicki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 16, 267 (1970).https://doi.org/APPLAB
24. W. H. Glenn, M. J. Brienza, A. J. Demaria, Appl. Phys. Lett. 12, 54 (1968); https://doi.org/APPLAB
W. Schmidt, F. P. Shafer, Phys. Lett. 26A, 558 (1968);
D. J. Bradley, A. J. F. Durrant, Phys. Lett. 27A, 73 (1968).
25. A. Dienes, C. V. Shank, A. M. Trozzolo, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Quantum Electronics Conf., Kyoto, Japan (1970).
26. O. G. Peterson, S. A. Tuccio, B. B. Snavely, Appl. Phys. Lett. 17, 245 (1970).https://doi.org/APPLAB
27. S. A. Tuccio (to be published).
28. R. H. Kingston, Proc. IRE 50, 472 (1962); https://doi.org/PIREAE
N. M. Kroll, Phys. Rev. 127, 1207 (1962); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
S. A. Akhmanov, R. V. Khokhlov, Sov. Phys.—JETP 16, 252 (1963); https://doi.org/SPHJAR
J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, P. S. Persham, Phys. Rev. 127, 1918 (1962); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
C. C. Wang, C. W. Racette, Appl. Phys. Lett. 6, 189 (1965).https://doi.org/APPLAB
29. J. A. Giordmaine, R. C. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 973 (1965).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
30. B. B. Snavely, Proc. IEEE 57, 1374 (1969).https://doi.org/IEEPAD

More about the Authors

John L. Emmett. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C..