Form factors of elementary particles

JAN 01, 1969

Scattering of electrons on nucleons and electron‐positron scattering in colliding‐beam experiments give a measure of the size and charge distribution of the proton, neutron and pion. Theoretical understanding is fairly advanced for the pion but still uncertain for the nucleons.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3035356

Richard Wilson

How BIG ARE the elementary particles? How is their charge distributed? These questions are tackled with form factors, which are measures of the charge and magnetic‐moment distributions in the particles. Scattering of electrons on nucleons, and recent measurements made with electron–positron colliding beams, give form factors for the proton, neutron and pion. The behavior of the pion form factor can be fairly well understood by the “rho‐dominance model,” but the nucleon form factors are not so easy to understand. Different models are currently being examined in an attempt to solve this basic problem in strong‐interaction physics.

References

1. R. W. McAllister, R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. 102, 851 (1956).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
2. E. Fermi, L. Marshall, Phys. Rev. 72, 1139 (1947).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
3. S. Furuichi, K. Watanabe, Prog. Theor. Phys. 35, 174 (1966).https://doi.org/PTPKAV
4. N. G. Antoniou, J. E. Bowcock, Phys. Rev. 159, 1257 (1967).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
5. P. Signell, J. W. Durso, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 185 (1967).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
6. J. S. Levinger, Phys. Rev. 162, 1589 (1967).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
7. S. D. Drell, Comments on Nuclear and Particle Physics 2, 36 (1968).
8. T. T. Wu, C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 137B, 708 (1965).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
9. T. Janssens et al., Phys. Rev. 142, 922 (1966).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
10. E. B. Hughes et al., Phys. Rev. 139B, 458 (1965).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
11. D. H. Coward et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 292 (1968).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
12. K. Berkelman et al., Phys. Rev. 130, 2061 (1963).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
13. C. W. Akerlof et al., Phys. Rev. 135B, 810 (1966).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
14. C. W. Akerlof et al., Phys. Rev. 163, 1482 (1967).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
15. M. Goitein et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 1016 (1967).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
16. R. Budnitz et al., Phys. Rev. 173, 1357 (1968).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
17. C. Mistretta et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 1523 (1968).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
18. J. K. de Pagter et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 767 (1967).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
19. B. Dudelzak et al., Nuovo Cimento 28, 18 (1963).https://doi.org/NUCIAD
20. J. E. Augustin et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 126 (1968).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
21. V. L. Auslander et al., Phys. Letters 25B, 433 (1967).
22. W. Albrecht et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 1192 (1966).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
23. J. G. Asbury et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 869 (1967).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
24. A. Wehmann et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 1523 (1968).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
25. M. M. Block et al., Phys. Rev. 169, 1074 (1968).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
26. A. Tollestrup, private communication.
27. B. D. Hyams et al., Phys. Letters 24B, 634 (1967).
28. M. Conversi et al., Nuovo Cimento 40, 690 (1965).https://doi.org/NUCIAD
29. V. E. Krohn et al., Phys. Letters 18, 297 (1965).https://doi.org/PHLTAM
30. E. Melkonian, B. M. Rustad, W. W. HavensJr, Phys. Rev. 114, 1571 (1959).https://doi.org/PHRVAO
31. M. N. Khatchaturyan et al., Phys. Letters, 24B, 349 (1967).

More about the Authors

Richard Wilson. Harvard faculty.