/
Article

Fluorocarbons and the stratosphere

OCT 01, 1975
Observations and experiments are under way in response to the growing concern that widely used fluorocarbons might cause a depletion in Earth’s protective ozone layer.

When the alarm was sounded last year that the ubiquitous fluorocarbon‐propelled spray cans might be responsible for slowly removing Earth’s protective ozone shield, reaction was widespread. Environmentalists urged an immediate ban, legislators held hearings and introduced legislation, government‐sponsored study committees were formed, fluorocarbon‐based industries defended their products and urged more definitive research (which they began to support in part). The concern, of course, is that the ozone layer shields life on Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation. Much relevant research was already underway, sponsored by the Federal government, and by now workers in such disparate fields as atmospheric science, chemistry, physics and astronomy are working to answer the question, “Are the fluorocarbons depleting the ozone, and if so, how badly?”

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. M. J. Molina, F. W. Rowland, Nature 249, 810 (1974); https://doi.org/NATUAS
    F. W. Rowland, M. J. Molina, Rev. Geophys. and Space Phys. 13, 1 (1975).https://doi.org/RGPSBL

  2. 2. “Fluorocarbons and the Environment” (Report of Federal Task Force on Inadvertent Modification of the Stratosphere), Council on Environmental Quality and Federal Council for Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., June 1975.

  3. 3. R. S. Stolarski, R. J. Cicerone, Can. J. Chem. 52, 1610 (1974).https://doi.org/CJCHAG

  4. 4. “Environmental Impact of Stratospheric Flight,” National Academy of Sciences–National Research Council. Washington, D.C., 1 April 1975.

  5. 5. V. Ramanathan, “Greenhouse Effect Due to Chlorofluorocarbons—Climatic Implications,” to be published in Science, 1975.

  6. 6. S. C. Wofsy, M. B. McElroy, N. D. Sze, Science 187, 1165 (1975).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  7. 7. P. Crutzen, Geophys. Res. Lett. 1, 205 (1974).https://doi.org/GPRLAJ

  8. 8. R. Vupputuri, B. W. Boville. paper at 4th Climatic Impact Assessment Program, Cambridge, Mass., 1975.

  9. 9. A. Lazrus, B. Gandrud. R. Woodard, W. Sedlacek, Geophys. Res. Lett., to be published.

  10. 10. L. E. Heidt, R. Lueb, W. Pollock. D. H. Ehhalt, to be published.

  11. 11. A. L. Schmeltekopf, P. D. Goldan, W. R. Henderson, W. J. Harrop, T. L. Thompson, F. C. Fehsenfeld, H. I. Schiff, P. J. Crutzen, I. S. A. Isaksen, E. E. Ferguson. Geophys. Lett., to be published.

  12. 12. P. W. Krey, R. J. Lagomarsino, Environmental Quarterly, HASL‐294.

More about the authors

Gloria B. Lubkin, Senior Editor of PHYSICS TODAY.

Related content
/
Article
/
Article
Cognizant of their role within the scientific community, scientific societies had to weigh how to respond to the actions by the Atomic Energy Commission.
/
Article
Interviews now available to the public bring the famed physicist’s lesser-known early years to life.
/
Article
Graduate students in physics and astronomy struggle with mental health. Support from peers and advisers is critical; so is institutional change.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1975_10.jpeg

Volume 28, Number 10

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.