Discover
/
Article

Earthquake prediction

MAR 01, 1974
Variations in physical properties such as electrical conductivity and elevation of benchmarks may fortell not just the place but also the time and magnitude of an earthquake.
Carl Kisslinger

Earthquake prediction entails the specification of the time, place and magnitude of an individual future event. All three of these parameters are poorly known and complicated functions of the relative motions of parts of the Earth’s crust and mantle, the rate of strain accumulation in rocks and the strength of those rocks. Even if the processes by which the energy is accumulated and released were completely understood, the imprecise knowledge of the initial conditions, boundary conditions and relevant material properties would make the prediction of a particular seismic event very difficult.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. J. A. Kelleher, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 5745 (1970); https://doi.org/JGREA2
    L. R. Sykes, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 8021 (1971).https://doi.org/JGREA2

  2. 2. J. A. Kelleher, L. Sykes, J. Oliver, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 2547 (1973).https://doi.org/JGREA2

  3. 3. S. A. Fedotov, N. A. Dolbilkina, A. N. Morozov, V. I. Myachkin, V. B. Preobrazhensky, G. A. Sobolev, Tectonophysics 9, 249 (1970); https://doi.org/TCTOAM
    S. A. Fedotov, Trudy Inst. Fiz. Zemli, Akad Nauk SSSR 36, 66 (1965).

  4. 4. K. Shimazaki, Tectonophysics 11, 305 (1971).https://doi.org/TCTOAM

  5. 5. K. Mogi, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ. 46, 53 (1968).https://doi.org/TDJKAZ

  6. 6. T. Rikitake, “International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior,” in Comptes Rend. 18, 142 (1973).

  7. 7. Yu. V. Riznichenko, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR 157, 6 (1964); https://doi.org/DANKAS
    Yu. V. Riznichenko, A. I. Zakharova, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR 3, 178 (English Edition) (1971).

  8. 8. I. E. Gubin, Bull. Int. Inst. Seismology and Earthquake Eng. 4, 107 (1967).

  9. 9. H. F. Reid. “The Mechanics of the Earthquake; The California Earthquake of April 18, 1906,” Report of the State Investigation Commission, Vol. 2, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C. (1910).

  10. 10. I. Tsubokawa, Y. Ogawa, T. Hayashi, J. Geodetic Soc. Japan 10, 165 (1964).

  11. 11. T. Rikitake, Geophysical Surveys 1, 4 (1972);
    T. Dambara, EOS‐Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 55 (to be published 1974).https://doi.org/EOSTAJ

  12. 12. K. Kasahara, A. Okada, M. Shibano, V. Sasaki, S. Matsumoto, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ. 45, 225 (1967).https://doi.org/TDJKAZ

  13. 13. J. C. Savage, W. H. Prescott, W. T. Kinoshita, Proceedings of the Conference on Tectonic Problems of the San Andreas Fault System, Stanford University Publications in the Geological Sciences 13, 44 (1973).

  14. 14. M. D. Wood, R. V. Allen, Bull. Seis. Soc. Amer. 61, 1801 (1971).https://doi.org/BSSAAP

  15. 15. V. I. Ulomov, Zemya i Vselennaya 3, 23 (1968).

  16. 16. S. Suyehiro, T. Asada, M. Ohtake, Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics 15, 71 (1964);
    S. Suyehiro, Bull. Seis. Soc. Amer. 56, 185 (1966).https://doi.org/BSSAAP

  17. 17. L. Gedney, J. Van Wormer, EOS‐Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 55 (to be published, 1974); https://doi.org/EOSTAJ
    M. Wyss, W. H. K. Lee, Proceedings of the Conference on Tectonic Problems of the San Andreas Fault System, Stanford University Publications in the Geological Sciences 13, 24 (1973).

  18. 18. S. Matsushima, Bull. Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University 32 (1960);
    I. Gupta, Bull. Seis. Soc. Amer. 63, 1157 (1973).https://doi.org/BSSAAP

  19. 19. A. N. Semyenov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR 4, 245 (English edition) (1969);
    Y. P. Aggarwal, L. R. Sykes, J. Armbruster, M. L. Sbar, Nature 241, 101 (1973); https://doi.org/NATUAS
    C. Kisslinger, E. R. Engdahl. Tectonophysics (to be published, 1974).

  20. 20. J. H. Whitcomb, D. L. Anderson, Science 180, 632 (1973).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  21. 21. C. Kisslinger, E. R. Engdahl, Bull. Seis. Soc. Amer. 63, 1723 (1973).https://doi.org/BSSAAP

  22. 22. M. Wyss, D. Holcomb, Nature 245, 139 (1973).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  23. 23. O. Reynolds, Nature 33, 429 (1886).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  24. 24. W. F. Brace, B. W. PauldingJr, C. H. Scholz, J. Geophys. Res. 71, 3939 (1966).https://doi.org/JGREA2

  25. 25. A. Nur, Bull. Seis. Soc. Amer. 62, 1217 (1972).https://doi.org/BSSAAP

  26. 26. T. V. McEvilly, L. R. Johnson, Science 182, 581 (1973).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  27. 27. C. H. Scholz, L. R. Sykes, Y. P. Aggarwal, Science 181, 803 (1973).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  28. 28. J. H. Healy, W. W. Rubey, D. T. Griggs, C. B. Raleigh, Science 161, 1301 (1968).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

More about the Authors

Carl Kisslinger. Cooperative Institute for Research, Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1974_03.jpeg

Volume 27, Number 3

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.