Discover
/
Article

Do technical reports become published papers?

JUN 01, 1957
When the study discussed here was conducted, both authors were associated with the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Dwight Gray has since joined the National Science Foundation, while Staffan Rosenborg is still with the Library of Congress.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3060390

Dwight E. Gray
Staffan Rosenborg

Since World War II the technical report has come to occupy a position of considerable importance among media in which results of scientific research first appear. The estimated 50 000 or more documents of this kind which are issued each year—particularly by laboratories engaged in defense‐related research—constitute the first appearance in print of much of the newest and most important scientific information being developed today. Almost half of these reports carry no security classification. Yet, for the most part they are not covered by the standard abstracting and indexing services. This is partly because the enormous complexity of the scientific report picture would make systematic coverage very difficult and partly because it would be almost impossible to assure readers of the abstracts of access to the parent reports.

References

  1. 1. For a description of the National Science Foundation program directed toward improving the general availability of unpublished Government scientific reports, see Gray, Dwight E., College and Research Libraries, 18, 1, 23–27, January 1957.

  2. 2. The study was conducted by the Technical Information Division, Library of Congress, and was supported principally by the National Science Foundation; supplementary personnel support was provided by the Library and by the Armed Services Technical Information Agency.

  3. 3. Conducted by Mrs. Helen Brownson, National Science Foundation.

  4. 4. Predecessor to the ASTIA Reference Center.

  5. 5. Several such studies are summarized and referenced in Herner, Saul, “Technical Information—Too Much or Too Little”, Scientific Monthly, 83, 2, 82–86, August 1956.https://doi.org/KHYKD8

More about the Authors

Dwight E. Gray. National Science Foundation.

Staffan Rosenborg. Library of Congress.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1957_06.jpeg

Volume 10, Number 6

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.