Discover
/
Article

Cosmology and elementary‐particle physics

SEP 01, 1979
The early universe is the poor man’s high‐energy physics laboratory; knowledge about its state can be deduced from current observations and can illuminate our knowledge of the fundamental interactions.
Michael S. Turner
David N. Schramm

Over the past decade or so, great progress has been made in two diverse areas of physics—cosmology and elementary‐particle physics. In spite of the obvious differences of the two fields (figure 1), each has begun to illuminate the other, making interdisciplinary work involving them not only possible but even exciting. Thus, for example, the cosmological abundance of helium‐4 fixes an upper limit of 8 on the number of quark varieties (“flavors”) in models that have a symmetry between quarks and leptons. And developments in the grand unified theories of elementary processes may resolve the puzzle of why there are roughly a billion photons for every baryon in the universe. As our knowledge of the fundamental particles and their interactions increases, and as our determination of cosmological observables improves (or new observables are discovered) the close relationship of these two disciplines promises to continue to be an exciting one.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. A. A. Penzias, R. W. Wilson, Astrophys. J. 142, 419 (1965).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  2. 2. D. N. Schramm, R. V. Wagoner, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 27, 37 (1977).https://doi.org/ARNUA8

  3. 3. S. W. Hawking, G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space‐Time, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge (1973).

  4. 4. H. Georgi, S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  5. 5. G. F. Smoot, M. V. Gorenstein, R. A. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 898 (1977).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  6. 6. D. N. Schramm, R. V. Wagoner, PHYSICS TODAY 27, no. 12, 40 (1974).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  7. 7. G. Steigman, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 14, 339 (1976).https://doi.org/ARAAAJ

  8. 8. S. Weinberg, The First Three Minutes, Basic, New York (1977).

  9. 9. J. Yang, D. N. Schramm, G. Steigman, R. T. Rood, Astrophys. J. 227, 697 (1979).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  10. 10. J. E. Gunn, B. W. Lee, I. Lerche, D. N. Schramm, G. Steigman, Astrophys. J. 223, 1015 (1978), and references therein.https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  11. 11. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 850 (1979), and references therein.https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  12. 12. F. Reines, University of California at Irvine report UCI‐10P19‐125 (1977).

  13. 13. M. S. Turner, D. N. Schramm, Nature 279, 303 (1979).https://doi.org/NATUAS

More about the Authors

Michael S. Turner. University of Chicago.

David N. Schramm. University of Chicago.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1979_09.jpeg

Volume 32, Number 9

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.