Cosmology and elementary‐particle physics
DOI: 10.1063/1.2995733
Over the past decade or so, great progress has been made in two diverse areas of physics—cosmology and elementary‐particle physics. In spite of the obvious differences of the two fields (figure 1), each has begun to illuminate the other, making interdisciplinary work involving them not only possible but even exciting. Thus, for example, the cosmological abundance of helium‐4 fixes an upper limit of 8 on the number of quark varieties (“flavors”) in models that have a symmetry between quarks and leptons. And developments in the grand unified theories of elementary processes may resolve the puzzle of why there are roughly a billion photons for every baryon in the universe. As our knowledge of the fundamental particles and their interactions increases, and as our determination of cosmological observables improves (or new observables are discovered) the close relationship of these two disciplines promises to continue to be an exciting one.
References
1. A. A. Penzias, R. W. Wilson, Astrophys. J. 142, 419 (1965).https://doi.org/ASJOAB
2. D. N. Schramm, R. V. Wagoner, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 27, 37 (1977).https://doi.org/ARNUA8
3. S. W. Hawking, G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space‐Time, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge (1973).
4. H. Georgi, S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
5. G. F. Smoot, M. V. Gorenstein, R. A. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 898 (1977).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
6. D. N. Schramm, R. V. Wagoner, PHYSICS TODAY 27, no. 12, 40 (1974).https://doi.org/PHTOAD
7. G. Steigman, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 14, 339 (1976).https://doi.org/ARAAAJ
8. S. Weinberg, The First Three Minutes, Basic, New York (1977).
9. J. Yang, D. N. Schramm, G. Steigman, R. T. Rood, Astrophys. J. 227, 697 (1979).https://doi.org/ASJOAB
10. J. E. Gunn, B. W. Lee, I. Lerche, D. N. Schramm, G. Steigman, Astrophys. J. 223, 1015 (1978), and references therein.https://doi.org/ASJOAB
11. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 850 (1979), and references therein.https://doi.org/PRLTAO
12. F. Reines, University of California at Irvine report UCI‐10P19‐125 (1977).
13. M. S. Turner, D. N. Schramm, Nature 279, 303 (1979).https://doi.org/NATUAS
More about the Authors
Michael S. Turner. University of Chicago.
David N. Schramm. University of Chicago.