Discover
/
Article

Cosmic Rays, Nuclear Gamma Rays and the Origin of the Light Elements

APR 01, 1998
Recent observations of Li, Be and B abundances in halo stars formed in the early Galaxy shed new light on the source of cosmic rays, suggesting acceleration from the ejecta of supernovae.

DOI: 10.1063/1.882257

Reuven Ramaty
Benzion Kozlovsky
Richard Lingenfelter

The origin of cosmic rays has been a major mystery in astrophysics for nearly a century. However, any lingering doubt about whether the bulk of the cosmic rays (those with energies below about 1015eV) are Galactic or extragalactic has been removed in the 1990s in favor of a Galactic origin. The question has been settled by gamma‐ray observations made by the Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope on the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory. The EGRET observations showed that the cosmic‐ray energy density in a nearby galaxy—the Small Magellanic Cloud—is much lower than that found locally in our own Galaxy and is thus inconsistent with a uniform extragalactic density. This discovery, of course, does not preclude an extragalactic origin for the very highest energy cosmic rays, which are observed above about 1019eV. (See PHYSICS TODAY, January 1998, page 31). The power of about 1041ergs/s required to maintain the cosmic rays throughout the Galaxy is most likely supplied by supernovae (figure 1). With a Galactic supernova rate of roughly three per century, the required energy per supernova is about 1050ergs, which is about 10% of the kinetic energy of the expanding supernova ejecta. Shock acceleration in the supernova blast wave driven by the ejecta could impart such a proportion of the available kinetic energy to cosmic rays.

References

  1. 1. S. P. Maran, ed., The Astronomy and Astrophysics Encyclopedia, Van Nostrand, New York (1992);
    see cosmic‐ray reviews by J. P. Wefel, P. Meyer, R. E. Lingenfelter and J. R. Jokipii, supernova reviews by R. A. Fresen, K. Nomoto and S. E. Woosley, and a Wolf‐Rayet review by M. A. Azzopardi.

  2. 2. For the EGRET observations of the Magellanic clouds, see P. Sreekumar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 127 (1993).https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    For the EGRET data on Orion, see S. W. Digel, S. D. Hunter, R. Mukherjee, Astrophys. J. 441, 270 (1995).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  3. 3. For beryllium observations, see P. Molaro, P. Bonifacio, F. Castelli, L. Pasquini, Astron. and Astrophys. 319, 593 (1997).
    For boron observations, see D. K. Duncan et al., Astrophys. J. 488, 338 (1997). https://doi.org/ASJOAB
    For 6Li observations, see L. M. Hobbs, J. A. Thorburn, Astrophys. J. 491, 772 (1997). https://doi.org/ASJOAB
    For the first suggestion that B and Be in the early Galaxy are produced mainly by accelerated C and O, see D. K. Duncan, D. L. Lambert, M. Lemke, Astrophys. J. 401, 584 (1992).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  4. 4. F. X. Timmes, S. E. Woosley, T. A. Weaver, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 98, 617 (1995).

  5. 5. H. Reeves, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 193 (1994).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  6. 6. S. E. Woosley, T. A. Weaver, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 101, 181 (1995)

  7. 7. R. Ramaty, B. Kozlovsky, R. E. Lingenfelter, H. Reeves, Astrophys. J. 488, 730 (1997).

  8. 8. For the meteorite data, see M. Chaussidon, F. Robert, Nature 374, 337 (1995),
    For the interstellar data, see S. R. Federman, D. L. Lambert, J. A. Cardelli, Y. Sheffer, Nature 381, 764 (1996).https://doi.org/NATUAS

  9. 9. H. Bloemen et al., Astron. and Astrophys. 281, 5 (1994);
    H. Bloemen, Astrophys. J. 475, 251997).

  10. 10. R. Ramaty, B. Kozlovsky, R. E. Lingenfelter, Astrophys. J. 456, 525 (1996). https://doi.org/ASJOAB
    R. Ramaty, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl. 120, C373 (1996).
    B. Kozlovsky, R. Ramaty, R. E. Lingenfelter, Astrophys. J. 484, 286 (1997).

  11. 11. E. M. G. Parizot, M. Casse, E. Vangioni‐Flam, Astron. And Astrophys. 328, 107 (1997).

  12. 12. B. B. Nath, P. L. Biermann, Month. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 270, L33 (1994).
    A. M. Bykov, H. Bloemen, Astron. and Astrophys. 283, 1 (1994).
    H. Bloemen, A. Bykov, in Proc. 4th Compton Symp. part 1, C. D. Dermer, M. S. Strickman, J. D. Kurfess, eds., AIP, New York (1998) p. 249.

  13. 13. M. Casse, R. Lehoucq, E. Vangioni‐Flam, Nature 373, 318 (1995).

  14. 14. M. Maeder, G. Meynet, Astron. and Astrophys. 287, 803 (1994),
    P. Massey, C. C. Lang, K. DeGioia‐Eastwood, C. D. Garmany, Astrophys. J. 438, 188 (1995).

  15. 15. W. R. Webber, Space Set. Rev. 81, 107 (1997).

  16. 16. J.‐P. Meyer, L. O’C. Drury, D. C. Ellison, Astrophys. J. 487, 182 (1997).
    D. C. Ellison, L. O’C. Drury, J.‐P. Meyer, Astrophys. J. 487, 197 (1997).

  17. 17. For coronal and solar energetic particle abundances, see D. V. Reames, Adv. Space Res. 15, no. 7, 41 (1995).
    For the extension of the solar energetic particle model to acceleration in stellar atmospheres, see M. M. Shapiro, in 25th International Cosmic Ray Conf. M. S. Potgieter, B. C. Raubenheimer, D. J. van der Walt, eds., Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education, Potchefstroom, South Africa (1997), vol. 4, p. 353.

  18. 18. For a discussion of refractory carbon in SN1987A, see L. B. Lucy, I. J. Danziger, C. Gouiffes, P. Bouchet, in Structure and Dynamics of the Interstellar Medium, G. Tenorio‐Tagle, M. Moles, J. Melnick, eds.. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1989), p. 164,
    For a discussion of freshly released grains, see C. J. Cesarsky, J.‐P. Bibnng, in Origin of Cosmic Rays, G. Setti, G. Spada, A. W. Wolfendale, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1981), p. 361,
    For a discussion of strontium and barium in SN1987A, see P. A. Mazzali, L. B. Lucy, andK. Butler, Astron. and Astrophys. 258, 399 (1992).

More about the Authors

Reuven Ramaty. NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland.

Benzion Kozlovsky. Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Richard Lingenfelter. University of California, San Diego.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1998_04.jpeg

Volume 51, Number 4

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.