Discover
/
Article

Consistent Histories and Quantum Measurements

AUG 01, 1999
The traditional Copenhagen orthodoxy saddles quantum theory with embarrassments like Schrödinger’s cat and the claim that properties don’t exist until you measure them. The consistent‐histories approach seeks a sensible remedy.
Robert B. Griffiths
Roland Omnès

Students of quantum theory always find it a very difficult subject. To begin with, it involves unfamiliar mathematics: partial differential equations, functional analysis, and probability theory. But the main difficulty, both for students and their teachers, is relating the mathematical structure of the theory to physical reality. What is it in the laboratory that corresponds to a wavefunction, or to an angular momentum operator? Or, to use the picturesque term introduced by John Bell, what are the “beables” (pronounced BE‐uh‐bulls) of quantum theory—that is to say, the physical referents of the mathematical terms?

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge U. P., Cambridge, England (1987).

  2. 2. N. Bohr, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher‐Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed., Tudor, New York (1951) p. 201. Reprinted in ref. 4, p. 9.

  3. 3. R. Griffiths, J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219 (1984). https://doi.org/JSTPBS
    R. Omnès, J. Stat. Phys. 53, 893 (1988). https://doi.org/JSTPBS
    M. Gell‐Mann, J. B. Hartle, in Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, W. Zurek ed., Addison Wesley, Reading, Pennsylvania (1990) p 425.

  4. 4. Quantum Theory and Measurement, J. A. Wheeler, W. H. Zurek. eds., Princeton U. P., Princeton, N. J. (1983), This book reprints a number of important papers on quantum foundations and paradoxes.

  5. 5. J. S. Bell, in Sixty‐Two Years of Uncertainty, A. I. Miller, ed., Plenum, New York (1990), p. 17.

  6. 6. B. Friedrich, D. Herschbach, Daedalus 127, No. 1, 165 (1998).

  7. 7. R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1604 (1998).https://doi.org/PLRAAN

  8. 8. For a superb discussion, see R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison‐Wesley, New York (1963), vol. 1, chap. 37, or vol. 3, chap. 1.

  9. 9. R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2759 (1996).https://doi.org/PLRAAN

  10. 10. M. Gell‐Mann, J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev. D 47, 3345 (1993).https://doi.org/PRVDAQ

  11. 11. R. Omnès, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 339 (1992).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  12. 12. R. Omnès, Understanding Quantum Mechanics, Princeton U. P., Princeton, N. J. (1999).

More about the authors

Robert B. Griffiths, Carnegie‐Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Roland Omnès, University of Paris XI, Orsay, France.

In These Collections
Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1999_08.jpeg

Volume 52, Number 8

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.