Discover
/
Article

Civil defense in limited war—a debate

APR 01, 1976
Have recent developments in strategic weapons given us reason to look at civil defense in a new context?

DOI: 10.1063/1.3023423

Arthur A. Broyles
Eugene P. Wigner
Sidney D. Drell

Civil defense, once a hotly debated issue of the 1960’s, has again surfaced as a topic of controversy. It reappears amid the discussions of possible new strategies being proposed by the Defense Department. In January 1974, the then Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger announced the intention of the US to develop long‐range ballistic missiles of unprecedented accuracy. Because such weapons would have a relatively small error radius their yield would not have to be as large to be effective against military targets such as land‐based offensive missiles. Hence the Defense Department has raised the possibility of a limited nuclear war with counterforce strikes (that is, against the opponent’s offensive force) coupled with a program of civil defense to ensure a minimal level of civilian casualties.

References

  1. 1. Civil Defense, a Report to the Atomic Energy Commission by a Committee of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1968.
    Available as TID‐24690 from Division of Technical Information Extension, ERDA, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830;
    T. L. Martin, D. C. Latham, Strategy for Survival, University of Arizona Press, Tucson (1963);
    C. M. Haaland, Systems Analysis of US Civil Defense Via National Blast Shelter Systems, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Report ORNL‐TM‐2457 (1970).

  2. 2. Civil Defense, (N. I. Akimov, ed.), Moscow, 1969.
    Translated by S. J. Rimshaw, ORNL‐tr‐2306 (1971).

  3. 3. S. Glasstone, The Effects of Nuclear Weapons (revised edition), US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1974).

  4. 4. R. H. Sandwina, “Ponast II,” Proceedings of the Radiological Defense Officers Conference, South Lake Tahoe, 23–25 October 1974, State of California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services.

  5. 5. E. P. Wigner, “The Myth of Assured Destruction,” in The Journal of Civil Defense (Survive), July–August 1970, P.O. Box 910, Starke, Florida.

  6. 6. D. L. Narver Jr, D. T. Robbins, Engineering and Cost Considerations for Tunnel Grid Blast Shelter Complex, ORNL‐tm‐1183 (1965);
    D. T. Robbins, D. L. Narver Jr, Engineering Study for Tunnel Grid Blast Shelter Concept for Portion of City of Detroit, Michigan, ORNL‐tm‐1223 (1975).

  7. 7. Long‐Term World Wide Effects of Multiple Nuclear‐Weapons Detonations, The National Research Council (Committee Chairman, Alfred O. C. Nier); The National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. (1975).

  8. 8. Analyses of Effects of Limited Nuclear Warfare, prepared for the Subcommittee on Arms Control, International Organizations and Security Agreements, of the Committee on Foreign Relations, US Senate, September 1975.

  9. 9. Hearings before the Subcommittee on International Organization and Disarmament Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations, US Senate, Ninety‐first Congress.

More about the Authors

Arthur A. Broyles. University of Florida, Gainesville.

Eugene P. Wigner. Princeton University.

Sidney D. Drell. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1976_04.jpeg

Volume 29, Number 4

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.