Discover
/
Article

Chandrasekhar vs. Eddington—an unanticipated confrontation

OCT 01, 1982
For many years astronomers did not accept the validity of a young scientist’s application of the new physics because it was ridiculed by a preeminent astronomer.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2914790

Kameshwar C. Wali

Stellar evolution has for many years been one of the most exciting fields of research in astronomy and astrophysics. In the early 1930s, a young astrophysicist named Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar certainly felt this excitement when in his theoretical work he found a fundamental parameter that determines the destiny of stars. By appling both relativity and the new quantum mechanics, Chandrasekhar found a critical mass, below which stars end up as white dwarfs, and above which, as later work would show, they end up as neutron stars or black holes.

References

  1. 1. See, for instance, S. Chandrasekhar, Am. J. Phys. 37, 577 (1969); https://doi.org/AJPIAS
    S. Chandrasekhar, Observatory 92, 160 (1972); https://doi.org/OBSEAR
    and interview of S. Chandrasekhar by S. Weart, AIP Niels Bohr Library, 1977, 162 pages.

  2. 2. R. H. Fowler, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 87, 114 (1926).

  3. 3. S. Chandrasekhar, Phil. Mag. 11, 592, 594 (1931).

  4. 4. S. Chandrasekhar, Z. Astrophys. 5, 321 (1932). https://doi.org/ZEASAJ
    Von Wilhelm Anderson and Edmund Clifton Stoner had independently considered relativistic effects on electron degeneracy. Their work implied the existence of a limiting mass. See, for example, E. C. Stoner, Phil. Mag. 9, 944 (1930). It was Chandrasekhar, however, who obtained a unique value for the critical mass by using the equation of state in conjunction with polytropic theory.

  5. 5. These and other excerpts are from conversations with Chandrasekhar.

  6. 6. Observatory 58, 37 (1935).https://doi.org/OBSEAR

  7. 7. Letter from W. H. McCrea, November 1979, in response to my request for his recollections and comments.

  8. 8. The ensuing excerpts are from correspondence between Chandrasekhar and Rosenfeld between January and July 1935.

  9. 9. S. Chandrasekhar, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 91, 456 (1931);
    S. Chandrasekhar, Astrophys. J. 74, 81 (1931).

  10. 10. S. Chandrasekhar, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 95, 219 (1935).

More about the Authors

Kameshwar C. Wali. Syracuse University, New York.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1982_10.jpeg

Volume 35, Number 10

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.