/
Article

Can physics develop reasoning?

FEB 01, 1977
The findings of Swiss scholar Jean Piaget suggest that it can—by helping people achieve a series of four distinct but overlapping stages of intellectual growth as they search for patterns and relationships.
Robert G. Fuller
Robert Karplus
Anton E. Lawson

The life of every physicist is punctuated by events that lead him to discover that the way physicists see natural phenomena is different from the way nonphysicists see them. Certain patterns of reasoning appear to be more common among physicists than in other groups. These include:

▸ focussing on the important variables (such as the force that accelerates the apple, rather than the lump it makes on your head);

▸ propositional logic (“if heat were a liquid it would occupy space and a cannon barrel could only contain a limited amount of heat, but this is contrary to my observations, so…”), and

▸ proportional reasoning (for example, the restoring force of a spring increases linearly with its displacement from equilibrium).

References

  1. 1. Proceedings of the Workshop of Physics Teaching and the Development of Reasoning (Anaheim, Calif. January 1975), American Association of Physics Teachers, Stony Brook, N.Y. (1975).

  2. 2. E. F. Karplus, R. Karplus, School Sci. and Math. 70, 5 (1970).

  3. 3. B. Inhelder, J. Piaget, The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence, Basic Books, New York (1958).

  4. 4. PHYSICS TODAY, June 1972.

  5. 5. D. Griffiths, Amer. J. Phys. 14, 81 (1976); https://doi.org/AJPIAS
    G. Kolodiy, J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 5, 20 (1975); https://doi.org/JSCTBN
    A. E. Lawson, F. Nordland, A. DeVito, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 12, 423 (1976); https://doi.org/JRSTAR
    J. W. McKinnon, J. W. Renner, Amer. J. Phys. 39, 1047 (1971); https://doi.org/AJPIAS
    J. W. Renner, A. E. Lawson, Phys. Teach. 11, 273 (1973); https://doi.org/PHTEAH
    C. A. Tomlinson‐Keasey, Dev. Psychol. 6, 364 (1972).

  6. 6. The Collected Works of Count Rumford (S. C. Brown, ed.), Harvard U.P., Cambridge, Mass. (1968).

  7. 7. L. Eason, A. J. Friedman, Phys. Teach. 13, 491 (1975).https://doi.org/PHTEAH

  8. 8. P. de H. Hurd, School Sci. and Math. 53, 439 (1953).

  9. 9. M. B. Rowe, The Science Teacher 42, 21 (1975).

  10. 10. A. B. Arons, Amer. J. Phys. 44, 834 (1974).https://doi.org/AJPIAS

More about the authors

Robert G. Fuller, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley.

Robert Karplus, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley.

Anton E. Lawson, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley.

Related content
/
Article
Detecting quantum particles of gravity was long considered hopeless. A new perspective, which takes advantage of quantum technologies, suggests that an experimental realization may be closer than previously thought.
/
Article
As higher-education programs compete for a shrinking pool of students, departments must better communicate the value that a physics major brings.
/
Article
Three physicists give a firsthand account of disarmament efforts in the 1980s and 1990s.
/
Article
Researchers don’t need to do science engagement alone. Working with professionals makes the job easier and more effective and can lead to better science.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1977_02.jpeg

Volume 30, Number 2

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.