Discover
/
Article

Build the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor?

JUN 01, 1996
[A centerpiece of almost any discussion about the future of magnetic fusion is the proposed International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). PHYSICS TODAY invited Thomas Stix and A ndrew Sessler to present their cases against continuation of the ITER project, and Marshall Rosenbluth to reply. The debate doses with a brief rebuttal by Stix and Sessler. The views of the authors are not necessarily those of their employers. A glossary of fusion terms is provided on page 24.]

DOI: 10.1063/1.881499

Andrew M. Sessler
Thomas H. Stix
Marshall N. Rosenbluth

Controlled fusion represents an opportunity to replace fossil fuels and nuclear fission as energy sources. Intensive research aimed at the peaceful utilization of thermonuclear energy, now in its 46th year, has benefited enormously from vigorous international scientific exchange and collaboration. Much has already been accomplished. In the approach to controlled fusion that uses magnetic confinement—the subject of this opinion piece—plasma temperatures obtained in experimental devices have risen from a few electron volts to over 40 keV; energy confinement times have stretched from tens of microseconds to over a second; total nuclear energy output has gone from zero to a few megajoules, amounting to about 30% of the externally supplied plasma‐heating energy.

References

  1. 1. International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, Establishment of ITER: Relevant Documents, IAEA/ITER/DS/1, ITER Documentation Series, IAEA, Vienna (1988).

  2. 2. M. Huguet, in Proc. 15th IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering, IEEE, New York (1994), vol. 1, p. 1.

  3. 3. President’s Committee of Advisers on Science and Technology, The US Program of Fusion Energy Research and Development: Report of the Fusion Review Panel, Washington, DC (July 1995).

  4. 4. Fusion Energy Advisory Committee, A Restructured Fusion Energy Sciences Program, US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Washington, DC (27 January 1996).

More about the Authors

Andrew M. Sessler. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.

Thomas H. Stix. Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.

Marshall N. Rosenbluth. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1996_06.jpeg

Volume 49, Number 6

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.