Discover
/
Article

Arms Control Physics: The New Soviet Connection

NOV 01, 1989
Informal contacts established between US and Soviet physicists during an unpromising period in relations between the superpowers have taken on new significance since Gorbachev’s emergence.
Frank von Hippel

US and Soviet scientists have been holding quiet discussions on matters like missile defense since the first International Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs in 1957 (see PHYSICS TODAY, September, page 81). Sometimes these discussions have constituted an informal “backchannel” between the governments for consideration of possible arms control initiatives. Thus in conversations between US and Soviet scientists in 1964, US scientists argued that ABM systems would not be effective against a determined adversary and that their deployment would stimulate an offense‐defense arms race; they accordingly proposed a treaty to limit ABM systems. Two high‐level Soviet scientists, Lev Artsimovich (who was head of the Soviet fusion program) and Mikhail Millionshchikov (who was vice president for applied physics and mathematics of the Soviet Academy of Sciences), subsequently helped bring their government around to this position, thereby contributing to the achievement in 1972 of the ABM Treaty.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. R. L. Garthoff, in Ballistic Missile Defense, A. B. Carter, D. N. Schwartz, eds., Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. (1984), p. 298n.

  2. 2. V. Aleksandrov, G. Stenchikov, in Proc. on Applied Mathematics, Computing Center, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow (1983).
    G. S. Golitsyn, A. S. Ginsburg, Possible Climatic Consequences of Nuclear War and Some Natural Analogues: A Scientific Investigation, Committee of Soviet Scientists for Peace and Against the Nuclear Threat, Moscow (1984).

  3. 3. S. Talbot, Master of the Game, Norton, New York (1988), pp. 347–8.

  4. 4. FAS Public Interest Report, February 1988, p. 14.

  5. 5. J. R. Primack et al., Science 244, 407 (1989).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  6. 6. P. G. Schrag, Listening for the Bomb: A Study in Nuclear Arms Control Verification Policy, Westview, Boulder, Colo. (1989), p. 84.

More about the Authors

Frank von Hippel. Public and International Affairs, Princeton University.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1989_11.jpeg

Volume 42, Number 11

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.