Discover
/
Article

Arms Control Physics: The New Soviet Connection

NOV 01, 1989
Informal contacts established between US and Soviet physicists during an unpromising period in relations between the superpowers have taken on new significance since Gorbachev’s emergence.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881210

Frank von Hippel

US and Soviet scientists have been holding quiet discussions on matters like missile defense since the first International Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs in 1957 (see PHYSICS TODAY, September, page 81). Sometimes these discussions have constituted an informal “backchannel” between the governments for consideration of possible arms control initiatives. Thus in conversations between US and Soviet scientists in 1964, US scientists argued that ABM systems would not be effective against a determined adversary and that their deployment would stimulate an offense‐defense arms race; they accordingly proposed a treaty to limit ABM systems. Two high‐level Soviet scientists, Lev Artsimovich (who was head of the Soviet fusion program) and Mikhail Millionshchikov (who was vice president for applied physics and mathematics of the Soviet Academy of Sciences), subsequently helped bring their government around to this position, thereby contributing to the achievement in 1972 of the ABM Treaty.

References

  1. 1. R. L. Garthoff, in Ballistic Missile Defense, A. B. Carter, D. N. Schwartz, eds., Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. (1984), p. 298n.

  2. 2. V. Aleksandrov, G. Stenchikov, in Proc. on Applied Mathematics, Computing Center, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow (1983).
    G. S. Golitsyn, A. S. Ginsburg, Possible Climatic Consequences of Nuclear War and Some Natural Analogues: A Scientific Investigation, Committee of Soviet Scientists for Peace and Against the Nuclear Threat, Moscow (1984).

  3. 3. S. Talbot, Master of the Game, Norton, New York (1988), pp. 347–8.

  4. 4. FAS Public Interest Report, February 1988, p. 14.

  5. 5. J. R. Primack et al., Science 244, 407 (1989).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  6. 6. P. G. Schrag, Listening for the Bomb: A Study in Nuclear Arms Control Verification Policy, Westview, Boulder, Colo. (1989), p. 84.

More about the Authors

Frank von Hippel. Public and International Affairs, Princeton University.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1989_11.jpeg

Volume 42, Number 11

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.