Discover
/
Article

An operational interpretation of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics

APR 01, 1969
Idealized experiments show that a physical measurement involves three stages: initial state preparation, perturbation and examination for the probability that a particular final state is occupied.
Willis E. Lamb

WHAT IS QUANTUM MECHANICS? A remarkable feature of the 1968 conference of Nobel prize winners in physics at Lindau is that it was possible for me to ask such a question in the presence of two of the founders of quantum mechanics, Werner Heisenberg and P.A.M. Dirac, more than 30 years after the discovery, in a lecture attended by 400 students who had recently begun their study of the subject. Several answers to the question are possible. The only easy one is that quantum mechanics is a discipline that provides a wonderful set of rules for calculating physical properties of matter. For such simple systems as hydrogen and helium atoms the calculated energy levels agree with experiment to fantastic accuracy. In more complicated cases the computations are difficult and the accuracy is lower, but it is reasonable to believe, in principle at least, that the theory would be adequate if only the calculational problems could be overcome.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. W. Heisenberg, Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory, University of Chicago Press (1930), p. 21.

  2. 2. W. Pauli, “The General Principles of Wave Mechanics,” in Handbuch der Physik, vol. 24/1, Springer, Berlin (1933), pp. 163–164.

  3. 3. E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics Wiley, New York (1961), p. 158.

  4. 4. J. von Neumann, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, p. 1 (1927);
    p. 245 (1927);
    p. 273 (1927).

  5. 5. L. D. Landau, Zeits. für Physik 45, 430 (1927).

  6. 6. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 25, 62 (1929).https://doi.org/PCPSA4

  7. 7. P. A. M. Dirac, Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press (1958), p. 37.

  8. 8. Op. cit. ref. 2, pp. 164–166.

  9. 9. Op. cit. ref. 2, pp. 143–154.

  10. 10. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice‐Hall, New York (1951), chap. 22.

  11. 11. K. Gottfried, Quantum Mechanics, vol. 1, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York (1966), chap. 4.

  12. 12. Op. cit. ref. 1, p. 32.

  13. 13. N. Bohr, L. Rosenfeld, Det. Kgl. Dansk. Vid. Selskab 12, 8 (1933).

  14. 14. H. P. Robertson, Phys. Rev. 35, 667A (1930).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  15. 15. E. Schrödinger, Sitzungsber. preuss. Akad. Wiss, p. 296 (1930).

More about the authors

Willis E. Lamb, Yale.

Related content
/
Article
A half century after the discovery of Hawking radiation, we are still dealing with the quantum puzzle it exposed.
/
Article
Since the discovery was first reported in 1999, researchers have uncovered many aspects of the chiral-induced spin selectivity effect, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
/
Article
Metrologists are using fundamental physics to define units of measure. Now NIST has developed new quantum sensors to measure and realize the pascal.
/
Article
Nanoscale, topologically protected whirlpools of spins have the potential to move from applications in spintronics into quantum science.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1969_04.jpeg

Volume 22, Number 4

Get PT newsletters in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.