Discover
/
Article

Advances in superconductivity

OCT 01, 1969
Understanding has progressed from thermodynamic and phenomenological arguments to the pairing theory. Interest now is in problems of space and time variation of the pair potential and in theoretical prediction of relevant parameters.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3035191

John Bardeen

THE RAPID EXPANSION of the field of superconductivity in the past decade has been due to three factors: First, the microscopic theory provides a basis for interpretation of experimental data and prediction of new effects. Second, new superconducting materials have been discovered, some of which remain superconducting to very high magnetic fields. And third, applications are beginning to appear. These include superconducting magnets, linear accelerators, very sensitive detecting instruments and voltage standards. A comprehensive review has recently been published.

References

  1. 1. Superconductivity, (R. D. Parks, ed.) vols. 1 and 2, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1969).

  2. 2. J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 106, 162 (1957); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, J. R. Schrieffer, 108, 1175 (1957).https://doi.org/PHRVAO , Phys. Rev.

  3. 3. C. J. Gorter, H. B. G. Casimir, Phys. Z. 35, 963 (1934); https://doi.org/PHZTAO
    C. J. Gorter, H. B. G. Casimir, Z. Techn. Phys. 15, 539 (1934).https://doi.org/ZTPHAU

  4. 4. H. London, F. London, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A149, 71 (1935).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  5. 5. V. L. Ginzburg, L. D. Landau, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950).https://doi.org/ZETFA7

  6. 6. F. London, Superfluids, vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1950).

  7. 7. B. S. DeaverJr, W. M. Fairbank, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 43 (1961); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    R. Doll, M. Näbauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 51 (1961).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  8. 8. H. Fröhlich, Phys. Rev. 79, 845 (1950).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  9. 9. M. A. Biondi, A. T. Forrester, M. P. Garfunkel, C. B. Satterthwaite, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 1109 (1958).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  10. 10. A. B. Pippard, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A216, 547 (1953).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  11. 11. V. L. Ginzburg, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 48, 25 (1952); https://doi.org/UFNAAG
    M. R. Schafroth, Phys. Rev. 100, 463 (1955).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  12. 12. L. N. Cooper, Phys. Rev. 104, 1189 (1956).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  13. 13. J. Bardeen, D. Pines, Phys. Rev. 99, 1104 (1955).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  14. 14. A. A. Abrikosov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 32, 1442 (1957) https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    [A. A. Abrikosov, English transl.: Sov. Phys.‐JETP 5, 1174 (1957)].https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  15. 15. F. Bloch, PHYSICS TODAY 19, no. 5, 27 (1966).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  16. 16. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 110, 827 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  17. 17. N. N. Bogoliubov, Nuovo Cimento 7, 794 (1958); https://doi.org/NUCIAD
    J. G. Valatin, Nuovo Cimento 7, 843 (1958).https://doi.org/NUCIAD

  18. 18. R. E. GloverIII, M. Tinkham, Phys. Rev. 108, 243 (1957).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  19. 19. D. C. Mattis, J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 111, 412 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  20. 20. J. Bardeen, G. Rickayzen, L. Tewordt, Phys. Rev. 113, 982 (1959).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  21. 21. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 112, 1900 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  22. 22. G. Rickayzen, Phys. Rev. 115, 795 (1959).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  23. 23. N. N. Bogoliubov, V. V. Tolmachev, D. V. Shirkov, A New Method in the Theory of Superconductivity, Consultants Bureau, New York (1959).

  24. 24. Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 117, 648 (1960).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  25. 25. L. P. Gor’kov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 34, 735 (1958) https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    [L. P. Gor’kov, English transl.: Sov. Phys.‐JETP 7, 505 (1958)].https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  26. 26. J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity, W. A. Benjamin, New York (1964).

  27. 27. P.‐G. deGennes, Superconductivity in Metals and Alloys, W. A. Benjamin New York (1966).

  28. 28. P. W. Anderson, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 11, 26 (1959).https://doi.org/JPCSAW

  29. 29. A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor’kov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 39, 1781 (1960) https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    [A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor’kov, English transl.: Sov. Phys.‐JETP 12, 1243 (1961)].https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  30. 30. B. D. Josephson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1, 251 (1962); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    B. D. Josephson, Advances in Physics 14, 419 (1965).https://doi.org/ADPHAH

  31. 31. I. Giaever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 147 and (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  32. 32. J. M. Rowell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 200 (1963).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  33. 33. R. C. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, J. E. Mercereau, A. H. Silver, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 159 (1964); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    R. C. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, J. E. Mercereau, A. H. Silver, Phys. Rev. A140, 1628 (1965).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  34. 34. S. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 80 (1963).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  35. 35. W. H. Parker, B. N. Taylor, D. N. Langenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 287 (1967).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  36. 36. B. N. Taylor, W. H. Parker, D. N. Langenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 375 (1969) (to be published also by Academic Press as a monograph); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    B. N. Taylor, W. H. Parker, D. N. Langenberg, PHYSICS TODAY 22, no. 8, 66 (1969).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  37. 37. P. W. Anderson, chap. I in Progress in Low Temperature Physics, vol. 5, (C. J. Gorter, ed.) North‐Holland, Amsterdam (1967).

  38. 38. J. Clarke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1566 (1968).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  39. 39. G. M. Eliashberg, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 38, 966 (1960) https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    [G. M. Eliashberg, English transl.: Sov. Phys.‐JETP 11, 696 (1960)].https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  40. 40. J. R. Schrieffer, D. J. Scalapino, J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 336 (1963); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    J. R. Schrieffer, D. J. Scalapino, J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. 148, 263 (1966).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  41. 41. W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  42. 42. J. Bardeen, R. Kümmel, A. Jacobs, L. Tewordt, Phys. Rev. (to be published).

  43. 43. K. Mendelssohn, PHYSICS TODAY 22, no. 4, 46 (1969).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  44. 44. W. V. Houston, PHYSICS TODAY 16, no. 9, 36 (1963).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  45. 45. G. Uhlenbeck, PHYSICS TODAY 13, no. 7, (1960).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

More about the Authors

John Bardeen. University of California.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1969_10.jpeg

Volume 22, Number 10

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.
/
Article
Defying the often-perceived incompatibility between the two subjects, some physicists are using poetry to communicate science and to explore the human side of their work.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.