Discover
/
Article

Advances in superconductivity

OCT 01, 1969
Understanding has progressed from thermodynamic and phenomenological arguments to the pairing theory. Interest now is in problems of space and time variation of the pair potential and in theoretical prediction of relevant parameters.
John Bardeen

THE RAPID EXPANSION of the field of superconductivity in the past decade has been due to three factors: First, the microscopic theory provides a basis for interpretation of experimental data and prediction of new effects. Second, new superconducting materials have been discovered, some of which remain superconducting to very high magnetic fields. And third, applications are beginning to appear. These include superconducting magnets, linear accelerators, very sensitive detecting instruments and voltage standards. A comprehensive review has recently been published.

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. Superconductivity, (R. D. Parks, ed.) vols. 1 and 2, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1969).

  2. 2. J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 106, 162 (1957); https://doi.org/PHRVAO
    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, J. R. Schrieffer, 108, 1175 (1957).https://doi.org/PHRVAO , Phys. Rev.

  3. 3. C. J. Gorter, H. B. G. Casimir, Phys. Z. 35, 963 (1934); https://doi.org/PHZTAO
    C. J. Gorter, H. B. G. Casimir, Z. Techn. Phys. 15, 539 (1934).https://doi.org/ZTPHAU

  4. 4. H. London, F. London, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A149, 71 (1935).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  5. 5. V. L. Ginzburg, L. D. Landau, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950).https://doi.org/ZETFA7

  6. 6. F. London, Superfluids, vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1950).

  7. 7. B. S. DeaverJr, W. M. Fairbank, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 43 (1961); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    R. Doll, M. Näbauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 51 (1961).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  8. 8. H. Fröhlich, Phys. Rev. 79, 845 (1950).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  9. 9. M. A. Biondi, A. T. Forrester, M. P. Garfunkel, C. B. Satterthwaite, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 1109 (1958).https://doi.org/RMPHAT

  10. 10. A. B. Pippard, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A216, 547 (1953).https://doi.org/PRLAAZ

  11. 11. V. L. Ginzburg, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 48, 25 (1952); https://doi.org/UFNAAG
    M. R. Schafroth, Phys. Rev. 100, 463 (1955).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  12. 12. L. N. Cooper, Phys. Rev. 104, 1189 (1956).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  13. 13. J. Bardeen, D. Pines, Phys. Rev. 99, 1104 (1955).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  14. 14. A. A. Abrikosov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 32, 1442 (1957) https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    [A. A. Abrikosov, English transl.: Sov. Phys.‐JETP 5, 1174 (1957)].https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  15. 15. F. Bloch, PHYSICS TODAY 19, no. 5, 27 (1966).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  16. 16. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 110, 827 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  17. 17. N. N. Bogoliubov, Nuovo Cimento 7, 794 (1958); https://doi.org/NUCIAD
    J. G. Valatin, Nuovo Cimento 7, 843 (1958).https://doi.org/NUCIAD

  18. 18. R. E. GloverIII, M. Tinkham, Phys. Rev. 108, 243 (1957).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  19. 19. D. C. Mattis, J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 111, 412 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  20. 20. J. Bardeen, G. Rickayzen, L. Tewordt, Phys. Rev. 113, 982 (1959).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  21. 21. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 112, 1900 (1958).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  22. 22. G. Rickayzen, Phys. Rev. 115, 795 (1959).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  23. 23. N. N. Bogoliubov, V. V. Tolmachev, D. V. Shirkov, A New Method in the Theory of Superconductivity, Consultants Bureau, New York (1959).

  24. 24. Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 117, 648 (1960).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  25. 25. L. P. Gor’kov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 34, 735 (1958) https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    [L. P. Gor’kov, English transl.: Sov. Phys.‐JETP 7, 505 (1958)].https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  26. 26. J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity, W. A. Benjamin, New York (1964).

  27. 27. P.‐G. deGennes, Superconductivity in Metals and Alloys, W. A. Benjamin New York (1966).

  28. 28. P. W. Anderson, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 11, 26 (1959).https://doi.org/JPCSAW

  29. 29. A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor’kov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 39, 1781 (1960) https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    [A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor’kov, English transl.: Sov. Phys.‐JETP 12, 1243 (1961)].https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  30. 30. B. D. Josephson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1, 251 (1962); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    B. D. Josephson, Advances in Physics 14, 419 (1965).https://doi.org/ADPHAH

  31. 31. I. Giaever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 147 and (1960).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  32. 32. J. M. Rowell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 200 (1963).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  33. 33. R. C. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, J. E. Mercereau, A. H. Silver, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 159 (1964); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    R. C. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, J. E. Mercereau, A. H. Silver, Phys. Rev. A140, 1628 (1965).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  34. 34. S. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 80 (1963).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  35. 35. W. H. Parker, B. N. Taylor, D. N. Langenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 287 (1967).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  36. 36. B. N. Taylor, W. H. Parker, D. N. Langenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 375 (1969) (to be published also by Academic Press as a monograph); https://doi.org/RMPHAT
    B. N. Taylor, W. H. Parker, D. N. Langenberg, PHYSICS TODAY 22, no. 8, 66 (1969).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  37. 37. P. W. Anderson, chap. I in Progress in Low Temperature Physics, vol. 5, (C. J. Gorter, ed.) North‐Holland, Amsterdam (1967).

  38. 38. J. Clarke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1566 (1968).https://doi.org/PRLTAO

  39. 39. G. M. Eliashberg, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 38, 966 (1960) https://doi.org/ZETFA7
    [G. M. Eliashberg, English transl.: Sov. Phys.‐JETP 11, 696 (1960)].https://doi.org/SPHJAR

  40. 40. J. R. Schrieffer, D. J. Scalapino, J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 336 (1963); https://doi.org/PRLTAO
    J. R. Schrieffer, D. J. Scalapino, J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. 148, 263 (1966).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  41. 41. W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968).https://doi.org/PHRVAO

  42. 42. J. Bardeen, R. Kümmel, A. Jacobs, L. Tewordt, Phys. Rev. (to be published).

  43. 43. K. Mendelssohn, PHYSICS TODAY 22, no. 4, 46 (1969).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  44. 44. W. V. Houston, PHYSICS TODAY 16, no. 9, 36 (1963).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

  45. 45. G. Uhlenbeck, PHYSICS TODAY 13, no. 7, (1960).https://doi.org/PHTOAD

More about the authors

John Bardeen, University of California.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1969_10.jpeg

Volume 22, Number 10

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.