Discover
/
Article

Addressing Public Concerns in Science

SEP 01, 1988
If the public doesn’t understand us, perhaps it’s because we aren’t listening. Answering the right questions in science policy depends on a sustained dialogue with the concerned public.
John F. Ahearne

Mistrust of technical experts by the general public is a growing problem in science policy. The National Science Board reports that whereas 80 percent of the public believes that scientists work for the good of humanity, 55 percent believes that their knowledge gives scientists a power that makes them dangerous. The image of the crazed scientist plotting to master and destroy remains a staple of both children’s and adult fiction, as Spencer Weart explained in a recent article in this magazine (June, page 28).

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. W. C. Clark, “Witches, Floods, and Wonder Drugs,” R‐22, Institute of Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C. (January 1980).

  2. 2. W. Schultz, G. McClelland, B. Hurd, J. Smith, Improving Accuracy and Reducing Costs of Environmental Benefits Assessment, vol. IV, Center for Economic Analysis, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo. (1986).

  3. 3. H. J. Otway, D. von Winterfeldt, Policy Sci. 14, 255 (1982).

  4. 4. T. Dietz, P. C. Stern, R. W. Rycroft, “Definitions of Conflict and the Legitimization of Resources: The Case of Environmental Risk,” Sociological Forum (in press).

  5. 5. Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident, Washington, D.C. (6 June 1986).

  6. 6. National Commission on Space, Pioneering the Space Frontier, Bantam, New York (1986).

  7. 7. J. F. Ahearne, Science 236, 677 (1987).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  8. 8. “Chernobyl Officials Are Sentenced to Labor Camp,” The New York Times, 30 July 1987, p. A5.

  9. 9. A. Williams‐Ellis, Men Who Found Out, Coward‐McCann, New York (1930), p. 43;
    quoted in Congressional Research Service Report CB‐150 (29 May 1969), p. 32.

  10. 10. A. Hacker, Electric Perspectives, Summer 1980 (Edison Electric Institute publ. no. 07‐80‐22), p. 11. See also S. Weart, Nuclear Fear: A History of Images, Harvard U.P., Cambridge, Mass. (1988).

  11. 11. H. M. Sapolsky, in AIDS: Public Policy Dimensions, United Hospital Fund of New York (1987), p. 108.

  12. 12. G. B. Shaw, quoted in M. J. Saks, Technol. Rev. 90, 43 (August/ September 1987).https://doi.org/TEREAU

  13. 13. H. Brooks, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 119, 259 (1975).https://doi.org/PAPCAA

  14. 14. D. Greenberg, quoted in The Public Interest 88, 151 (Summer 1987).

  15. 15. H. R. Pagels, Science Focus 2 (1), 2 (Summer 1987).

More about the Authors

John F. Ahearne. Princeton University, 1966.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1988_09.jpeg

Volume 41, Number 9

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.