Discover
/
Article

Addressing Public Concerns in Science

SEP 01, 1988
If the public doesn’t understand us, perhaps it’s because we aren’t listening. Answering the right questions in science policy depends on a sustained dialogue with the concerned public.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881133

John F. Ahearne

Mistrust of technical experts by the general public is a growing problem in science policy. The National Science Board reports that whereas 80 percent of the public believes that scientists work for the good of humanity, 55 percent believes that their knowledge gives scientists a power that makes them dangerous. The image of the crazed scientist plotting to master and destroy remains a staple of both children’s and adult fiction, as Spencer Weart explained in a recent article in this magazine (June, page 28).

References

  1. 1. W. C. Clark, “Witches, Floods, and Wonder Drugs,” R‐22, Institute of Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C. (January 1980).

  2. 2. W. Schultz, G. McClelland, B. Hurd, J. Smith, Improving Accuracy and Reducing Costs of Environmental Benefits Assessment, vol. IV, Center for Economic Analysis, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo. (1986).

  3. 3. H. J. Otway, D. von Winterfeldt, Policy Sci. 14, 255 (1982).

  4. 4. T. Dietz, P. C. Stern, R. W. Rycroft, “Definitions of Conflict and the Legitimization of Resources: The Case of Environmental Risk,” Sociological Forum (in press).

  5. 5. Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident, Washington, D.C. (6 June 1986).

  6. 6. National Commission on Space, Pioneering the Space Frontier, Bantam, New York (1986).

  7. 7. J. F. Ahearne, Science 236, 677 (1987).https://doi.org/SCIEAS

  8. 8. “Chernobyl Officials Are Sentenced to Labor Camp,” The New York Times, 30 July 1987, p. A5.

  9. 9. A. Williams‐Ellis, Men Who Found Out, Coward‐McCann, New York (1930), p. 43;
    quoted in Congressional Research Service Report CB‐150 (29 May 1969), p. 32.

  10. 10. A. Hacker, Electric Perspectives, Summer 1980 (Edison Electric Institute publ. no. 07‐80‐22), p. 11. See also S. Weart, Nuclear Fear: A History of Images, Harvard U.P., Cambridge, Mass. (1988).

  11. 11. H. M. Sapolsky, in AIDS: Public Policy Dimensions, United Hospital Fund of New York (1987), p. 108.

  12. 12. G. B. Shaw, quoted in M. J. Saks, Technol. Rev. 90, 43 (August/ September 1987).https://doi.org/TEREAU

  13. 13. H. Brooks, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 119, 259 (1975).https://doi.org/PAPCAA

  14. 14. D. Greenberg, quoted in The Public Interest 88, 151 (Summer 1987).

  15. 15. H. R. Pagels, Science Focus 2 (1), 2 (Summer 1987).

More about the Authors

John F. Ahearne. Princeton University, 1966.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1988_09.jpeg

Volume 41, Number 9

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.