Discover
/
Article

A Numerical Laboratory

OCT 01, 1987
One can simulate and visualize the complex evolution of fluid flow by doing ‘computer experiments,’ which have emerged as a third method for investigating nature, complementing traditional experimental and theoretical work.
Karl‐Heinz A. Winkler
Jay W. Chalmers
Stephen W. Hodson
Paul R. Woodward
Norman J. Zabusky

In a series of talks in 1946, John von Neumann envisioned the use of high‐speed computers to generate solutions to nonlinear problems, particularly in fluid dynamics. He pointed out that scientists were conducting expensive and difficult experiments to observe physical behavior even when the underlying principles and governing equations were known. “The purpose of the experiment is not to verify a proposed theory but to replace a computation from an unquestioned theory by direct measurements,” he wrote. “Thus wind tunnels are used at present, at least in large part, as computing devices of the so‐called analogy type to integrate the nonlinear partial differential equations of fluid dynamics.”

This article is only available in PDF format

References

  1. 1. H. H. Goldstine, J. von Neumann, in John von Neumann, Collected Works, vol. V, Pergamon, New York (1963), p. 1.

  2. 2. 2. For an example, see N. J. Zabusky, PHYSICS TODAY, July 1984, p. 36.

  3. 3. For an impressive compendium of such photographs, see M. Van Dyke, An Album of Fluid Motion, Parabolic, Stanford, Calif. (1982).

  4. 4. K.‐H. A. Winkler, S. W. Hodson, J. W. Chalmers, M. McGowen, D. E. Tolmie, P. R. Woodward, N. J. Zabusky, Cray Channels, Summer 1987, p. 4.

  5. 5. P. R. Woodward, D. H. Porter, M. Ondrechen, J. Pedelty, K.‐H. A. Winkler, J. W. Chalmers, S. W. Hodson, N. Zabusky, in Proc. Third Int. Symp. on Science and Engineering on Cray Supercomputers, W. Porter, ed., Cray Research Inc, Minneapolis, Minn., in press.

  6. 6. For a detailed discussion of the usefulness of these auxiliary displays, see K.‐H. A. Winkler, M. L. Norman, in Astrophysical Radiation Hydrodynamics, K.‐H. A. Winkler, M. L. Norman, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1986), p. 223.

  7. 7. P. R. Woodward, P. Colella, J. Comput. Phys. 54, 115 (1984).https://doi.org/JCTPAH

  8. 8. P. Colella, P. R. Woodward, J. Comput. Phys. 54, 174 (1984).https://doi.org/JCTPAH

  9. 9. P. R. Woodward, in Astrophysical Radiation Hydrodynamics, K.‐H. A. Winkler, M. L. Norman, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1986), p. 245.

  10. 10. Cray Channels, Summer 1987, p. 37.

  11. 11. P. Thompson, in Fundamentals of Human‐Computer Interaction, A. Monk, ed., Academic, New York (1984), p. 5.

  12. 12. K.‐H. A. Winkler, M. L. Norman, J. L. Norton, in Supercomputers: Algorithms, Architectures, and Scientific Computation, F. A. Matsen, T. Tajima, eds., U. of Texas P., Austin (1986), p. 415.

  13. 13. J.‐F. Haas, B. Sturtevant, Interaction of Weak Shock Waves with Cylindrical and Spherical Gas Inhomogeneities, Caltech Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories preprint (March 1987);
    J. Fluid Mech., in press.

  14. 14. J. M. Picone, J. P. Boris, Vorticity Generation by Shock Propagation Through Bubbles in a Gas, Naval Research Laboratory preprint (April 1987);
    J. Fluid Mech., in press.

  15. 15. J. M. Picone, J. P. Boris, Phys. Fluids 26, 365 (1983).https://doi.org/PFLDAS

  16. 16. D. L. Book, J. P. Boris, A. L. Kuhl, E. S. Oran, J. M. Picone, S. T. Zalesak, in Proc. Seventh Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics (Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 141), W. C. Reynolds, R. W. MacCormack, eds., Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1981), p. 84.

  17. 17. P. R. Woodward, Astrophys. J. 207, 484 (1976).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  18. 18. P. R. Woodward, in Early Solar System Processes, Proc. Int. School of Phys., “Enrico Fermi” course no. 73, D. Lal, ed., Italian Physics Society, Bologna (1980), p. 1.

  19. 19. P. Colella, H. M. Glaz, in Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics (Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 218), Soubbaramayer, J. P. Boujot, eds., Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1985), p. 154.

More about the Authors

Karl‐Heinz A. Winkler. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Jay W. Chalmers. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Stephen W. Hodson. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Paul R. Woodward. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Norman J. Zabusky. University of Pittsburgh.

Related content
/
Article
Figuring out how to communicate with the public can be overwhelming. Here’s some advice for getting started.
/
Article
Amid growing investment in planetary-scale climate intervention strategies that alter sunlight reflection, global communities deserve inclusive and accountable oversight of research.
/
Article
Although motivated by the fundamental exploration of the weirdness of the quantum world, the prizewinning experiments have led to a promising branch of quantum computing technology.
/
Article
As conventional lithium-ion battery technology approaches its theoretical limits, researchers are studying alternative architectures with solid electrolytes.
This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1987_10.jpeg

Volume 40, Number 10

Get PT in your inbox

pt_newsletter_card_blue.png
PT The Week in Physics

A collection of PT's content from the previous week delivered every Monday.

pt_newsletter_card_darkblue.png
PT New Issue Alert

Be notified about the new issue with links to highlights and the full TOC.

pt_newsletter_card_pink.png
PT Webinars & White Papers

The latest webinars, white papers and other informational resources.

By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.