Discover
/
Article

A Numerical Laboratory

OCT 01, 1987
One can simulate and visualize the complex evolution of fluid flow by doing ‘computer experiments,’ which have emerged as a third method for investigating nature, complementing traditional experimental and theoretical work.

DOI: 10.1063/1.881118

Karl‐Heinz A. Winkler
Jay W. Chalmers
Stephen W. Hodson
Paul R. Woodward
Norman J. Zabusky

In a series of talks in 1946, John von Neumann envisioned the use of high‐speed computers to generate solutions to nonlinear problems, particularly in fluid dynamics. He pointed out that scientists were conducting expensive and difficult experiments to observe physical behavior even when the underlying principles and governing equations were known. “The purpose of the experiment is not to verify a proposed theory but to replace a computation from an unquestioned theory by direct measurements,” he wrote. “Thus wind tunnels are used at present, at least in large part, as computing devices of the so‐called analogy type to integrate the nonlinear partial differential equations of fluid dynamics.”

References

  1. 1. H. H. Goldstine, J. von Neumann, in John von Neumann, Collected Works, vol. V, Pergamon, New York (1963), p. 1.

  2. 2. 2. For an example, see N. J. Zabusky, PHYSICS TODAY, July 1984, p. 36.

  3. 3. For an impressive compendium of such photographs, see M. Van Dyke, An Album of Fluid Motion, Parabolic, Stanford, Calif. (1982).

  4. 4. K.‐H. A. Winkler, S. W. Hodson, J. W. Chalmers, M. McGowen, D. E. Tolmie, P. R. Woodward, N. J. Zabusky, Cray Channels, Summer 1987, p. 4.

  5. 5. P. R. Woodward, D. H. Porter, M. Ondrechen, J. Pedelty, K.‐H. A. Winkler, J. W. Chalmers, S. W. Hodson, N. Zabusky, in Proc. Third Int. Symp. on Science and Engineering on Cray Supercomputers, W. Porter, ed., Cray Research Inc, Minneapolis, Minn., in press.

  6. 6. For a detailed discussion of the usefulness of these auxiliary displays, see K.‐H. A. Winkler, M. L. Norman, in Astrophysical Radiation Hydrodynamics, K.‐H. A. Winkler, M. L. Norman, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1986), p. 223.

  7. 7. P. R. Woodward, P. Colella, J. Comput. Phys. 54, 115 (1984).https://doi.org/JCTPAH

  8. 8. P. Colella, P. R. Woodward, J. Comput. Phys. 54, 174 (1984).https://doi.org/JCTPAH

  9. 9. P. R. Woodward, in Astrophysical Radiation Hydrodynamics, K.‐H. A. Winkler, M. L. Norman, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1986), p. 245.

  10. 10. Cray Channels, Summer 1987, p. 37.

  11. 11. P. Thompson, in Fundamentals of Human‐Computer Interaction, A. Monk, ed., Academic, New York (1984), p. 5.

  12. 12. K.‐H. A. Winkler, M. L. Norman, J. L. Norton, in Supercomputers: Algorithms, Architectures, and Scientific Computation, F. A. Matsen, T. Tajima, eds., U. of Texas P., Austin (1986), p. 415.

  13. 13. J.‐F. Haas, B. Sturtevant, Interaction of Weak Shock Waves with Cylindrical and Spherical Gas Inhomogeneities, Caltech Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories preprint (March 1987);
    J. Fluid Mech., in press.

  14. 14. J. M. Picone, J. P. Boris, Vorticity Generation by Shock Propagation Through Bubbles in a Gas, Naval Research Laboratory preprint (April 1987);
    J. Fluid Mech., in press.

  15. 15. J. M. Picone, J. P. Boris, Phys. Fluids 26, 365 (1983).https://doi.org/PFLDAS

  16. 16. D. L. Book, J. P. Boris, A. L. Kuhl, E. S. Oran, J. M. Picone, S. T. Zalesak, in Proc. Seventh Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics (Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 141), W. C. Reynolds, R. W. MacCormack, eds., Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1981), p. 84.

  17. 17. P. R. Woodward, Astrophys. J. 207, 484 (1976).https://doi.org/ASJOAB

  18. 18. P. R. Woodward, in Early Solar System Processes, Proc. Int. School of Phys., “Enrico Fermi” course no. 73, D. Lal, ed., Italian Physics Society, Bologna (1980), p. 1.

  19. 19. P. Colella, H. M. Glaz, in Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics (Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 218), Soubbaramayer, J. P. Boujot, eds., Springer‐Verlag, Berlin (1985), p. 154.

More about the Authors

Karl‐Heinz A. Winkler. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Jay W. Chalmers. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Stephen W. Hodson. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Paul R. Woodward. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Norman J. Zabusky. University of Pittsburgh.

This Content Appeared In
pt-cover_1987_10.jpeg

Volume 40, Number 10

Related content
/
Article
Technical knowledge and skills are only some of the considerations that managers have when hiring physical scientists. Soft skills, in particular communication, are also high on the list.
/
Article
Professional societies can foster a sense of belonging and offer early-career scientists opportunities to give back to their community.
/
Article
Interviews offer a glimpse of how physicists get into—and thrive in—myriad nonacademic careers.
/
Article
Research exchanges between US and Soviet scientists during the second half of the 20th century may be instructive for navigating today’s debates on scientific collaboration.
/
Article
The Eisenhower administration dismissed the director of the National Bureau of Standards in 1953. Suspecting political interference with the agency’s research, scientists fought back—and won.
/
Article
Alternative undergraduate physics courses expand access to students and address socioeconomic barriers that prevent many of them from entering physics and engineering fields. The courses also help all students develop quantitative skills.

Get PT in your inbox

Physics Today - The Week in Physics

The Week in Physics" is likely a reference to the regular updates or summaries of new physics research, such as those found in publications like Physics Today from AIP Publishing or on news aggregators like Phys.org.

Physics Today - Table of Contents
Physics Today - Whitepapers & Webinars
By signing up you agree to allow AIP to send you email newsletters. You further agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.