Notes on the New Big Science
DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.3480
Robert Crease and Catherine Westfall, in their article “The New Big Science” (Physics Today, May 2016, page 30
As the authors note, US particle physics is now carried out mainly abroad. But the focus on ever-larger accelerators has simply moved to the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. The LHC’s community of 10 000 and annual budget of $1 billion dwarf the materials science effort at Brookhaven National Laboratory. 1
Crease and Westfall acknowledge that their discussion omits astronomy. But the huge 30-meter-class telescopes and the 4-meter-aperture solar instrument are presently the main arena for Big Science in the US (reference ; see also Physics Today, October 2005, page 30
The authors do not mention that US particle physics left the national labs precisely because the discipline was devastated by the termination of the overly ambitious Superconducting Super Collider in 1993. Hundreds left the field, once the flagship of US science, for astronomy or to work for hedge funds. 3 It is troubling that now Big Astronomy is following the same precarious path, closing even large telescopes to build a few behemoths. 4
The authors describe well the increased complexity of materials science at the national labs. Perhaps that community can, in time, learn to manage the complexity in ways that will guide others to the benefits of Big Science while avoiding its dangers.
References
1. Z. Merali, Nature 464, 482 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/464482a
2. E. Hand, Nature 478, 166 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/478166a
3. A. Cho, Science 310, 1882 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.310.5756.1882
4. P. Foukal, AAS Newsletter, iss. 127, 2 (October 2005).
More about the Authors
Peter Foukal. (pvfoukal@comcast.net) Nahant, Massachusetts.